The scenario itself was fun and very cool but I saw what they were trying to do. Illidan did what was *necessary*. All I have to say is "Really Naaru? All those Moon Guard that died for Illidan's power was necessary? All the enslavery in BC. Trying to destroy the roof of the world(Northrend) for Kil'Jaeden in WCIII? Was that necessary?"I don't think he shows that he cares about it much. I mean, like I said, he questions for about a second if he's no better than the Legion, but then says "Well, it's for Tyrande and Azeroth, so I'm good". This might be true, but he didn't even mourn about it after, he gets yelled at but then instead just yells back about how he did the right thing, and how they're all fools, instead of lamenting the loss or anything.
And I only brought up the Legion thing because it was to call into question Illidan's actual morals, and whether he lusts for power, or only wants more power to save Azeroth.
No Illidan has good intentions but that doesn't mean much, you can have the most noble of intentions but do methods that are so bad you become the very thing you fight against.
The right path is using Magic in a way that isn't sacrificing others, others that trust you. I never argued that he should die at the hands of the Eredar. If anything that's projection you are putting on me. We know what Magic can do so it's not crazy for Illidan to break that crowd control like thing that the Eredar had on Illidan without sacrificing his fellow Moon Guard.So what is the right path? Dying to the first random eredar sorceress and letting the world burn, because "it's not the right the to do"? What follows is letting the legion win is the right thing to do. Do you believe that?
Everything else is pretty much true.