Would you let your significant other have a sexbot?

[Powerogue]

Why would I let my sexbot have a sexbot? Where am I supposed to fit in the relationship anymore? THEY'RE ALREADY PERFECT FOR EACH OTHER! D:

[Spectral]

OT just jumped the shark.

I was looking for a snarky summary of how I felt about this thread, but this is much better than anything that popped to mind.

- - - Updated - - -

Not sure why you are rolling eyes... You think that one's SO belongs to them?

My eye roll is because very few people believe in literal ownership. The context would clearly indicate that is about what people consider acceptable. The person I replied to is doing a weird instinctive "I don't think that!" kind of thing.

[Azadina]

that is the definition of hypocritical because if your partner is not allowed to have sex toys then why should you be allowed one?

It's nowhere near the same thing. Wanna try again?

[Deleted]

Can I have sex with it too?

No, sexbot put you in the friendzone!

[Dontrike]

Who says that the significant other isn't the sexbot? Then that person wants another sexbot because the 1st one doesn't do the things that it used to.

[Deleted]

She doesnt need a sexbot.

[Mistame]

Well getting one pretty much would mean you think your partner is sexually inadequate.

Variety is the spice of life. It's either that, or she gets some realistic masks that make her look like someone else. I can't see anything good in banging the same person for the rest of my life.

Not to mention it's a pretty weird thing that I can't imagine a normal person would want.

Capitulating to someone else's "feels" just because you're sleeping with them seems weird to me.

[Bathory]

no, sexbot put you in the friendzone!

.....sexbot must DIE!

[breadisfunny]

It's nowhere near the same thing. Wanna try again?

yes it is do you not know what the definition of a sex toy is or something? both are sex toys. therefore to say one can have one but not the other is hypocritical. since both items give stimulation and pleasure they are both the same thing in relation to the question.

[Azadina]

yes it is do you not know what the definition of a sex toy is or something? both are sex toys. therefore to say one can have one but not the other is hypocritical. since both items give stimulation and pleasure they are both the same thing in relation to the question.

Do you support cheating too? As in having other partners as "sex toys"?

[breadisfunny]

Do you support cheating too? As in having other partners as "sex toys"?

a sex bot isn't a living breathing entity. it is a mostly inanimate object. looking at other humans as sex toys is rather disgusting and the kind of thinking sociopaths and psychopaths engage in. that's a nice leap of logic you made there.

[Azadina]

yes it is do you not know what the definition of a sex toy is or something? both are sex toys. therefore to say one can have one but not the other is hypocritical. since both items give stimulation and pleasure they are both the same thing in relation to the question.

a sex bot isn't a living breathing entity. it is a mostly inanimate object. looking at other humans as sex toys is rather disgusting and the kind of thinking sociopaths and psychopaths engage in. that's a nice leap of logic you made there.

You set the definition yourself. Who's the hypocrite now?

Also, in addition before I go to bed: Go foam at someone else. I'm not the first nor last who said no to the same question. It's boring.

[Zenotetsuken]

Not sure why my sexbot would want a sexbot of it's own.

[Masark]

Not sure why my sexbot would want a sexbot of it's own.

[xChurch]

How is it really that different from them bringing home a real person? If it looks and talks like a human and has sex like a human.....

[Mistame]

looking at other humans as sex toys is rather disgusting and the kind of thinking sociopaths and psychopaths engage in.

So unless you're monogamous, you're a socio-/psychopath?

that's a nice leap of logic you made there.

Straw men are cheap to build.

How is it really that different from them bringing home a real person? If it looks and talks like a human and has sex like a human.....

Because it's, you know, not a human/person? "Cheating" requires another person. Anyone that thinks sex toys, porn, masturbation, etc, and yes, even "sex bots" are "cheating" has no business in a relationship in the first place.

[hrugner]

It would end up like every other cool gadget my wife buys. She'd play with it for a month or two, then it would be mine.

[Deleted]

No. I would never let him. Sex shouldn't be somethinc mechanic, but something spirual, fleshy, lovingly.

[Deletedaccount1]

Variety is the spice of life. It's either that, or she gets some realistic masks that make her look like someone else. I can't see anything good in banging the same person for the rest of my life.



Capitulating to someone else's "feels" just because you're sleeping with them seems weird to me.

How old are you if I might ask?

[Breccia]

This bot is indistinguishable from a human. You can have a conversation with it and it will seem human in every way.

Talk about burying the lead with this thread! Fallout 4-style synths are readily available, and that's not the biggest question to discuss? What about "does it have a soul" or "do I have to pay it" or "Terminator movies sucked after #2"?