Opinions are irrelevant, you have no facts. They are a UN-affiliated panel, and simply reporting their findings to the UN HRC doesn't mean anything at all. None of this stuff has any weight whatsoever, nor should it be treated as an actual UN HRC announcement.
They're not part of the governing body, they're called the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent. Does that sound to you like a heavyweight consultant to the HRC? Do you think that a group with such a name would ever make a statement saying anything other than reparations are needed? The answer to both is obviously no.
The UN HRC forms lots of panels, all the time. They're always doing it, because it's how organizations like that show that they're conducting ongoing research. To pretend that these obscure panels' findings are going to be made manifest is just foolish.
Would be quite the boost for the economy if they did, but it would be better done with better economic principles rather than a direct infusion of cash to...whoever makes the claim I guess? This long after Slavery I feel like though reperations might seem like a good idea to some, but would just end up pissing off all non-black people who are in the same situation and yet don't get anything because of their family history. Yes black people do suffer more in some ways because of their skin, but all poor people are suffering, not just black ones.
Ya. I should pay for the atrocities my white ancestors committed by leaving Russia for being persecuted as Volga Germans in 1916.
Guessing you didn't watch the DNC.. everything is about slavery and racism and you are also a sexist if you dont vote for a sleazeball like Hillary (course... voting for Trump is equally bad if not worse..... honestly America... 319M people and THOSE 2 fucktards is the best you can come up with?? )
And that's the thrust of the ridiculousness of the argument. People, who weren't slaves, want money for other people, not necessarily even their direct ancestors, being slaves.
This would never happen in the United States. It's not even a non-starter. It's laughable (and I'm a lefty, too).
What truly cemented some black communities in their current state in the US is cultural and it is a culture they themselves have created and fuel. The glorification of crime and violence is the main issue, along with this perpetual state of seeing themselves as the victim no matter what. Take them out of that culture and hey presto, they are just like everyone else.
However that would mean having to take personal responsibillity for their predicament and for overcoming it, but people often don't like to think they are to blame in any way, so they feed off the bullshit merchants who say it is everybody else's fault and they in turn feed that bullshit to others, so the eternal cycle of bullshit rolls on.
It is not easy to break out of cultural practices ingrained within your community, but you can't blame others just because you can't be arsed to do so.
You only get one shot at life, don't waste it on being a victim of your own making.
Correction, the group is: "United Nations' Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, a body that reports to the international organization's High Commissioner on Human Rights". So yes. It does sound quite a bit like they have the ear of someone high up, namely the #1 person on the HRC. Call it "opinion" all you like, but the fact remains, regardless of how biased the group might be, they are not some vague, hardly known, never-heard-of-before group to the UN. They are advisors that are heard from by the person running the HRC. If someone stated that they reported to the President of the United States, I would (rightly) assume that they have some sway as they have the ear directly of the person in charge (the debate of whether the President is really "in charge" is another debate entirely).