Final Presidential Debate - October 19, 2016

[NED funded]

So did Hillary announce her road to war? Here I thought Trump would cause a nuclear war. Can I still vote for Bernie Sanders?

I'm eagerly wating the moment he uploads his third video, it's going to be a juicy one.

[Zaydin]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

[Lenonis]

Drop the discussion about race. It has no place here and it's against site rules.

Clarification question -- is talking about historic policy about race also not allowed -- IE -- Roosevelt's treatment of Japanese Americans? Especially if we aren't talking about racial traits or other issues that are likely to create forum issues?

Just wondering where the boundaries are.

- - - Updated - - -

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

Probably because no one is surprised after he said he's toss Clinton in jail.

[Sky High]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

unless it has to do with sexual assault no one cares how off the rails he is. that's a rule.

[Garnier Fructis]

Trump's beloved online polls are so accurate and trustworthy that somebody fucked with Breitbart's online poll and it shows Hillary winning the debate.

[NED funded]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

His statement is making its way through the internet and the media.

[mvaliz]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

Give it 12-24 hours... chances are this will be the Major headline Thurs > Mon.

[badzerath]

Maybe it's finally time to put out a compilation without quotes cut out of context? But then that would require actually studying her positions, and that's hard... Better strawman your way to victory!

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL position on gay marriage?

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL position on NAFTA?

What context am I missing about calling a former Klan member who filibustered the Civil Rights Act a mentor?

What context am I missing about telling international businessmen in paid speeches her dream is open borders?

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL targets of blame for the housing crash? (it wasn't wall street)

What context am I missing about her condemning investment banks while they contribute massive amounts of money to her campaign?

What context am I missing about her being a "champion for women" while accepting large donations from countries that abuse women?

What context am I missing about her sending classified information over a private server - then lying about it during an investigation?

What context am I missing about her attempting to destroy evidence after being notified?

What context am I missing about her publicly stating that her private server only contained private emails among her family?

[alexw]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

Because we are numb to it. When you have someone who is as utterly batshit insane as he has proven himself to be, it doesn't surprise in the least that he'd contest the peaceful transition of political power.

[Etselion]

Trump's beloved online polls are so accurate and trustworthy that somebody fucked with Breitbart's online poll and it shows Hillary winning the debate.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...ential-debate/ LOL

[Spunt]

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL position on gay marriage?

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL position on NAFTA?

What context am I missing about calling a former Klan member who filibustered the Civil Rights Act a mentor?

What context am I missing about telling international businessmen in paid speeches her dream is open borders?

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL targets of blame for the housing crash? (it wasn't wall street)

What context am I missing about her condemning investment banks while they contribute massive amounts of money to her campaign?

What context am I missing about her being a "champion for women" while accepting large donations from countries that abuse women?

What context am I missing about her sending classified information over a private server - then lying about it during an investigation?

What context am I missing about her attempting to destroy evidence after being notified?

What context am I missing about her publicly stating that her private server only contained private emails among her family?

This is MMO champ, there could be a video of her eating a baby while whipping slaves, and MMO champion will still praise her. Don't bother.

[Celista]

No, Jill Stein is making claims that she'll do things that 1) she would have no power to do and 2) don't work the way she thinks they do. So if you want to give the president power over the treasury and the ability to print money whenever he/she feels like it... sure, vote for Jill Stein.

No one can print money whenever he/she feels like it, not just because it's not within one individual's power to do but also because it causes things like hyperinflation. Do you have a source for that?

People don't like Stein because most of this country is conservative, nothing she has said is significantly different from Sanders' proposed policies.

[Lenonis]

What context am I missing about her ORIGINAL position on gay marriage?

I wish one of the right wingers or Trump supporters would explain to me how they think gay rights or gay marriage is a winning issue for them.

Cause Trump is AGAINST gay marriage. So who cares if Clinton came around to it yesterday, she's still better​ than Trump.

[DeadmanWalking]

Donald is going to go down in history as what you should not do when running for election.

[badzerath]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

Honestly, I would have the same position after the videos uploaded to youtube the past few days.

If anyone is curious how massive, hard-to-prove voter fraud is perpetrated - a guide is available on youtube from hidden cams recording people who work with the DNC and Hillary's campaign.

[TrumpIsPresident]

I am sorry, not going to assume it's not my misunderstanding. But, could you put that in practical terms? I still don't understand...

Sure.

I made this post before, if you missed it:

Approved racism/bigotry/sexism/etc are forms of racism/bigotry/sexism/etc that are currently acceptable to Left aligned persons.

Its any sort of hatred against Whites, against Israelis, against Christians, against Republicans, straight males, so on.

Its all the underline concepts of having hate for somebody based on characteristics that you don't like or agree with but without any of the negative stigma that accompanies other similar forms of hate.

This "approved hate" is essentially making a list of all the different reasons to hate somebody based on their characteristics and then saying some of them are acceptable.

What defines them as acceptable could either be the person the hate is directed to or the person the hate is coming from.

It doesn't necessarily mean that all under the banner of the Democratic Party share the hate.

It just means that, in the least, they're tolerating its existence.

Example:

BLM people are regularly spewing anti-White hate all over social media.

Other Left aligned persons might not share that hate, they might even think its as bad as any other form of hate, but they're not objecting to it, not in any substantial way.

For the self-proclaimed ruling body of "all things hate" to ignore hate within their own ranks is a sign of approval; ie approved hate.

[DeadmanWalking]

I wish one of the right wingers or Trump supporters would explain to me how they think gay rights or gay marriage is a winning issue for them.

Cause Trump is AGAINST gay marriage. So who cares if Clinton came around to it yesterday, she's still better​ than Trump.

It just exposes Donald's failures repeatedly. Use to be against gay marriage is not the same as still is against gay marriage. It is an attack line built on stupidity and a need to consume ones self.

[Sky High]

This is MMO champ, there could be a video of her eating a baby while whipping slaves, and MMO champion will still praise her. Don't bother.

moar hyperbole plox.

[ArguesWithStrangers]

How is Trump making an unprecedented declaration that he wouldn't commit to accepting the results of the election not a bigger freaking discussion?! It's the first time in American history a presidential candidate has been this bloody petty!

Because it's utterly irrelevant if he does not accept it. Unlike Bush vs. Gore, this election does not look like it is going to be close. If she beats him by a measurable margin and he's all "I don't accept the result!" the rest of the country says, "cool story bruh," and moves the fuck on.

[Lenonis]

It doesn't necessarily mean that all under the banner of the Democratic Party share the hate.

It just means that, in the least, they're tolerating its existence.

The problem is this argument goes both ways and therefore makes it a non-argument. The GOP has a TON of issues with their more extremist or outspoken members going off the rails and the party just turns a blind eye to it. Extremists on both sides are awful and both parties would be far better off without them.