We Have Pine Gap in Northern Australia
So Secret run bi the Americans , that even Australians like me cannot see it.
Americans are Wankers
What you provide us Kangas?
Fkn America want your AnswerSKROE
PINE GAP
We Have Pine Gap in Northern Australia
So Secret run bi the Americans , that even Australians like me cannot see it.
Americans are Wankers
What you provide us Kangas?
Fkn America want your AnswerSKROE
PINE GAP
You guys are ridiculous. First of all, there wouldn't be just one nuke. Our friendly Americans planned to drop JUST 171 nuclear bombs on our tiny country, which is 14 times smaller than Texas. Our capital city of 500,000 would be hammered by 24 bombs.
Cmon Skroe
What you know about PINE GAP
Americans have Target in Aussie
Here is Pine Gap you Yankess.. Making us Aussies a Nuke target
Cmon Yankees you stoopid agresive fucks
[Infracted - Nation Bashing]
Last edited by Annoying; 2016-11-01 at 03:23 PM.
And in the same post you think that the UK will be the definite looser in a UK vs Russian nuclear war, yet somehow you seem to think that the Americans would do nothing? Do you really belive Russia can nuke the Uk without NATO going apeshit on Russia? I'm guessing you do since you seem willing to argue an impossible scenario.
But thanks for proving what I wrote about you in the same post that you reply to it, you make Gollum seem coherent.
MAD
Nobody wins in a nuke shown down except the egotistical prick hiding in a luxurious bunker who pressed the button!
Two actually, the UK has maintained MAD with Russia for 50 years. You're assuming that because they are much bigger that they would require more warheads to wreck, your mistake is the fact that Russia is already almost entirely wasteland.
Saying the UK isn't a nuclear threat to Russia because in an exchange we could only turn all of their major cities into glass is comical.
One British Submarine can turn every single one of Russians cities into radioactive vapour but we know Russia can return the complement inkind but they know the USA would hit them with over 10k warheads! Plus France would have to hit them because of NATOs doctrine of an attack on one is an attack on all!
(number of ICBMs X number of warhead) + (number of SLBMs x number of warheads) = max number of missile warheads. Strategic nuclear arms are subject to treaties and verification as well.
While Russia has more warheads and fewer targets than the UK, Russia would still suffer crippling damage from ~200 UK warheads. Thats called a Pyrrhic victory. It also assumes Russia starts it.
- - - Updated - - -
The US only has less than 1600 ballistic missile delivered warheads and less than 600 strategic air delivered warheads in active service. More than enough to destroy Russia, but far from 10,000.
using nukemap classic
you would need a 9,000,000,000 Kiloton bomb to have 100% fatalities in an area the size of Texas.
Let that sink in for a moment, 9 BILLION Kiloton.
Russia, rattle that saber some more, because no one is taking you seriously.
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
The updated version does allow simulated mirvs, however it is limited to 100000 Kiloton blasts. even then it take 39-40 to cover the boarders of texas, let alone the interior. and even then that according to the sim is only for the thermal radiation, not the actual airblast damage which would require, many, many more.
Yeah but I guess they have a space-laser cannon by now that we haven't been told about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g77WN6obk4
It's going to wipe out all earth including Russia. That way, noone can question their victory. Right?