Somewhere at Blizzard headquarters.
Authors I have enjoyed enough to mention here: JRR Tolkein, Poul Anderson,Jack Vance, Gene Wolfe, Glen Cook, Brian Stableford, MAR Barker, Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, WM Hodgson, Fredrick Brown, Robert SheckleyJohn Steakley, Joe Abercrombie, Robert Silverberg, the norse sagas, CJ Cherryh, PG Wodehouse, Clark Ashton Smith, Alastair Reynolds, Cordwainer Smith, LE Modesitt, L. Sprague de Camp & Fletcher Pratt, Stephen R Donaldon, and Jack L Chalker.
I'm pretty torn on this. I really want to play a legacy Vanilla or BC server but I don't agree with the current state of private servers (stealing IP from Blizzard).
I hope that Blizz clues in and makes legacy content available to subscribe to. I see each expansion and Vanilla as an individual game (like WC3, Starcraft, Diablo 2, etc) that should be preserved and available to play. I'm not down with Legion anymore (was fun for a couple months) and really want to play WoW like I remember it 10 years ago.
In general you are of course correct. The abberation here is that a/b broke out wow specifically in subs and revenue for almost the entire period from the merger to late last year. Wow continues to be nearly 20% of a/b revenue (and may still depending on revenue from King acquisition). Thus posters (such as myself) refer to a specific accounting and disclosure change in the company last year.
Authors I have enjoyed enough to mention here: JRR Tolkein, Poul Anderson,Jack Vance, Gene Wolfe, Glen Cook, Brian Stableford, MAR Barker, Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, WM Hodgson, Fredrick Brown, Robert SheckleyJohn Steakley, Joe Abercrombie, Robert Silverberg, the norse sagas, CJ Cherryh, PG Wodehouse, Clark Ashton Smith, Alastair Reynolds, Cordwainer Smith, LE Modesitt, L. Sprague de Camp & Fletcher Pratt, Stephen R Donaldon, and Jack L Chalker.
Yea it would be nice if they stopped making mmo-champ more of a laughing stock than it already is.
I mean major news outlets in several countries (BBC, t-online in Germany and others) are not shy to discuss the issue or ridiculous enough to censor parts of it.
Other gaming-related sites are doing it.
Retail streamers are discussing it (positively or negatively doesn't matter).
Paying customers on official forums are discussing it.
Acti-Blizz themselves lent legitimacy to the whole idea (ops!) when they decided to give that crew the guided tour and take pictures with them (it wasn't a police line up with Mike Morhaime and Ion I hope?)
You were happy to express your glee tens of times when players loving legacy WoW lost the only option available to experience that content.
Now it's back you're all "hey mr. moderator they're hurting my sensitivities"
What a spineless coward ..
The personal attacks aside I want the discussion to not be about the goings on of something that is not allowed to be talked about and instead back to the topic and hand. If I wanted to talk about banned topics I'd go to a reddit or something else. I still don't think a small number of people playing illegally is 'proof' that the game would be a viable paid option for Blizz to pursue. And sorry that is a small number of people that want it.
How do you now the numbers, are you a magician or something?
U can't claim nothing as true unless you give evidence to that true, the same way i can't say that there is milions and milions of olders fans coming back, cause i don't know.
I can talk for me and some of my frieds that they want to come back, but i can't talk for toher people that i don't know.