You have to delusional to believe the Russians didn't extract anything from the Trump campaign and the RNC.Yes, they are. Going through articles posted a lot of the stuff is purely conjecture. They have ZERO in the way of hard evidence. They know something was likely done and simply agree upon that it was the Russians, because.
Then again, they go out of their way to talk about "hacking" when the most egrious one was phishing. Which saw Podesta hand out the details. No hacking involved in that and they happily ignore that the emails ultimatively still were the DNC ones. A lot of this is building up Russia as a boogeyman, avoiding talking about the actual DNC emails and the stuff written in them and what that would mean. It's like someone looking through your window, seeing you chop up the body of a murder victim and then the focus is on a breach of privacy by whomever it is most convenient for them to blame.
The same people who have derided and yelled about the CIA and similar organizations for years, who laughed about their report of WMD in Iraq and kept bringing up how dishonest and untrustworthy these sources are. Now believe them without a single shred of hard evidence. Solely because they SAY they have it and they HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION that it must've been because it fits what they want to belief.
Let's say even IF it was the Russians, at best they would deserve a price for investigative journalism. The evidence was the Democrats, the Emails were the Democrats, the bodies in the basement were the Democrats and the idiocy about giving them out (Hello Podesta!) was also the Democrats.
As someone who's relatively center and to his shame used to be center left. I'd rather argue with most non religious conservatives than with the left any day of the week.
More like, they were caught colluding and working together with certain people aswell as openly lying and misrepresenting facts. I know, finding out your press is just as bad as Fox if not worse stings but you gotta deal with it.
Maybe, just maybe because opinions are not necessarily based on facts and do not stand on their own. Even if you cross cite them several times and build upon that to make it seem like they are? It's similar to assertions, you need to actually prove them.
Common knowledge? I'd like to see that argument. It sounds more like you expect to go against scientific findings and evidence based upon opinion and then get outraged when someone begins to poke holes into it.
Yes, because everyone you disagree with is a creationist, religious etc.
If you can't discuss with people that either means you are bad at discussing or lack a foundation from which to do so. In either case, that's on you.