This is golden...
You earn money out of the economy by going to work and paying people who don't go to work.
These people who don't work, buy things that contribute to the economy which ends up constituting your salary which goes back into paying for the people who don't work.
What level of insanity are you at??
Since when did a job not entail earning money? It's the whole point.
I'm all for supporting people but the argument you put forth is ridiculous, that somehow his salary is dependent on recipients of his tax dollars whom for whatever reason don't/can't work.
Last edited by mmoc06ca072631; 2017-01-09 at 07:26 AM.
correct - he pays the people who work for those tax dollars in the form of his government who in turn sometimes support the people they love or may need their help that may not be able to work for whatever reason, those same people then spend those tax dollars of his they worked for on the things his company may produce, thereby completing the circle - money doesn't disapear into a vacuum once it's paid to someone or spent, it's circulated between everyone who participates in the economy
Last edited by Total Crica; 2017-01-09 at 08:30 AM.
The vast majority of people on welfare actually work. But you don't care. You think that since they get part of your money a VERY TINY PERCENTAGE of your taxes that you pay, that you get any say in what they get or how they can spend it. You pay less than $50 a year to pay for welfare.
uhm why are you taking 2% of your own taxes anyway?
Do you for some reason think that the government is fully funded by peoples taxes? Governments have multiply sources of revenue outside of taxation of private people.
The 2% could be wrong or it could be right but your method of determining it right or wrong is to simplistic.
We're going to build a wall andMexicoyou're gonna pay for it!
dragonmaw - EU
I vastly lowballed the cost of welfare by stating only the cost of SNAP as a general point that the claim that welfare only costs private citizens $50 each is pretty obviously wrong.
If you'd like to provide what you'd consider a plausible estimate for the percentage of the tax burden that's spent on welfare, I'm all ears. You're going to come up with a number that's a hell of a lot more than 2% though and be an order of magnitude or more higher than what the poster I replied to claimed.
I still stand with that he never had any real intention to build it. Asking for it in congress is probably his way to bury it forever.
I really want to see it though and wish we could submit designs. Try to imagine how it would look if we make it out of steel and adorn it with skulls and spikes, we could make it a new world wonder by making it the most Metal thing ever.
While it may well die in Congress the way these things often do, I can't imagine the logic in saying that asking Congress for appropriations is an effort to bury it - this would be the only reasonable starting point for any such project. An effort to not get it done would look more like starting with endless studies that don't actually move towards funding such a project in any meaningful way and then just blaming regulators or something.
Well the whole point here is to save face imho. He certainly can't tell all the morons that actually believed in a "wall" build by mexico that they were lied to. They are also not exactly the audience that would buy an endless swath of pointless feasability studies, most educated people realize that the majority of these are complete bullshit, even if there might be point to it. His target audience has probably an even worse opinion on them. By just throwing it out there and putting a price tag on it you can bury it very fast or at least turn it into a gloryfied fence while keeping face. Mexico paying for it is certainly not happening one way or another, so that this will be extend of it. I might give him too much credit here, but I don't thing even Trump was serious about that wall.
Last edited by Cosmic Janitor; 2017-01-09 at 02:42 PM.
A presidential candidate making a shitload of promises and then failing to go through with bunches of them?
What a shocker. This totally hasn't happened with literally every single presidential election in the past 50 years or so.
http://www.cbpp.org/research/federal...tax-dollars-go
If you ignore health care, safety net programs accounted for ~10% of the government's budget in 2015, $362B.