I don't really see much of an issue. If it was boys on the girl team I'd probably see it differently but girls on a boys team isn't exactly an advantage (not that it's necessarily a disadvantage either).
I don't really see much of an issue. If it was boys on the girl team I'd probably see it differently but girls on a boys team isn't exactly an advantage (not that it's necessarily a disadvantage either).
Should we really be teaching kids that rules and rules and everyone has to follow them when it is socially acceptable, dare I say the norm, for management and upper management to constantly break the same rules they enforce?
It's fairly common at my place of work to come in to work hours late and leave hours early, yet the people who work under me are held to a different standard. If we lie to our children and tell them rules are rules and everyone has to follow them, we're really just setting them up to fail. The last person who complained about my attendance or lack there of was retaliated against. Good ol' at will.
Who were cheated and robbed of their time? All the teams involved got to play the game which is what they all (kids anyway) wanted, the other teams now all technically won those previous games by default, the refs got paid, the court had their fees paid, the league had their dues paid.... not really seeing a waste/ cheating/ robbery of time or money. The only team that literally wasted their time is the one we're talking about here, but as you stated that's on them for not reading up on the rules beforehand.
When I play games with my friends, we generally have a 'no backsies' rule. If you forget to enforce the rules for a certain portion of the game, you cannot retroactively enforce them, you can only enforce them going forward.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
No no. We have to make sure everyone knows what awful, terrible children these kids are. I mean, they actually had girl cooties and boy cooties in the same place. Obvious lawbreakers waiting to happen.
Shame them. Cause youth basketball league rules are the same as criminal law.
The fact that 9 years olds were forfeited in a league for prepubescent kids and that some people on here even try to justify any of that shit, just show how some adults are worse then kids lmao. The fact that the kids were mature enough to just forfeit and not be babies about it, since you know its a league for kids to have fun in, puts people like orlong to shame.
When 9 years old can teach your maturity, its time to question yourself.
- - - Updated - - -
Its a league for 9 years old ffs. What time has been robbed, the entire thing is a waste of time for fun. Jesus christ, some people are mentally disabled lmao.
Last edited by minteK917; 2017-02-28 at 02:30 AM.
So, they broke the rules, and then "took a stand" by allowing the consequences to play out exactly as they're outlined?
well, I boldly took a stand by eating at taco bell, and then shitting out what felt like a kidney.
OUTRAGE! Everyone should be jailed to the maximum extent of the law allowable for federal tax evasion!
Its more they were given the option to break up the team and continue their season or stay together and forfeit and they chose to stay together.Originally Posted by kasuke06
Just pointing out that this is one of the dumbest ideas on record. If you have a law code that is so complex that it is impossible to know it all. Moreover, it's a law code that is heavily open to interpretation. As it is impossible to know the whole law, and how it will be enforced in a given case, it is of course quite possible that someone is punished for doing something they thought was completely legitimate. That is not justice.
A concise and transparent law code is a necessary precondition of a truly just society.
Even if we buy into ignorantia juris non excusat , it is dependent on the idea that people learn rules as they participate in society.
From Cicero in the Wikipedia you linked: "There is a true law, right reason, agreeable to nature, known to all men, constant and eternal, which calls to duty by its precepts, deters from evil by its prohibition. This law cannot be departed from without guilt. Nor is there one law at Rome and another at Athens, one thing now and another afterward; but the same law, unchanging and eternal, binds all races of man and all times."
I would bet that at least 90% of people would not say that playing a coed team in a men's league is cheating, given that women are not physically more able than men. If the law is not in keeping with the societal understanding of right and wrong that Cicero is discussing, ignorantia juris non excusat is certainly not a valid reason to convict. That is to say that ignorance in this case is a perfectly reasonable excuse.
Last edited by Delana; 2017-02-28 at 03:06 AM. Reason: Sorry, better idea.
Only if they removed the girls, not if they stayed together. Read the article again.
The St. John’s Chargers were sitting in third place in their division going into Friday night’s game and would still have been allowed to compete in the league playoffs, but only if the girls did not play, the parent said.
That moment a school basketball team is right and the rest of the world is wrong.
Good on them.
there's biological differences between men and women, and even boys and girls.
they should shouldn't be allowed to play together on a sport team.