As a former Subway employee the chicken used for the teriyaki is sketchy at best. It doesn't even have the same texture as other processed chicken products. Hell when you open the bag to prepare it it smells of cat piss ammonia.
As a former Subway employee the chicken used for the teriyaki is sketchy at best. It doesn't even have the same texture as other processed chicken products. Hell when you open the bag to prepare it it smells of cat piss ammonia.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
That is how all law works.
The burden of proof is always on the Plaintiff. If they are unable to prove that what the CBC said was false, they will lose.
Your example has one glaring flaw: You did not show that you had lab proof that I eat poop. Thus I would not have to prove that your proof is inaccurate.
Yes it's not difficult to get your distributor to change the ingredients to foil a lawsuit then change back to the cheaper one once any doubt is removed about what you are doing. Subway can do the same thing in this case. You always have the option to blame the distributor also to accomplish the same goal.
Sorry, meant CBC.
- - - Updated - - -
Straight from their site:
http://www.subway.com/en-us/menunutrition
"CHICKEN PATTY: Chicken breast with rib meat, water, chicken flavor (Sea salt, sugar, chicken stock,
salt, flavors, canola oil, onion powder, garlic powder, spice, chicken fat, honey), potato starch, sodium
phosphate, dextrose, carrageenan."
No soy in the chicken of the CBC article.
People allergic to soy would have sued Subway long ago.
That's the US site, but anyway... http://www.subway.com/~/media/canada...enchartcan.pdf
Soy all over the place.
Right from their Ingredient Information for People with Food Allergies and Sensitivities PDF:
http://www.subway.com/en-ca/menunutr...ce3f650a6.ashx
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
http://www.subway.com/en-ca/menunutr...on/realchicken says otherwise. If you download the "Product Ingredients - Canada" Youll find:
CHICKEN CUTLET: Chicken breast meat, water, seasoning (sea salt, sugar, chicken stock, salt,
flavours, canola oil. onion powder, garlic powder, spice, chicken fat, honey), soy protein,
sodium phosphates.
CHICKEN STRIPS: Boneless, skinless, chicken breasts, water, soy protein concentrate,
modified potato starch, sodium phosphate, potassium chloride, salt, maltodextrin, yeast
extract, flavours, spices, dextrose, onion powder, carmelized sugar, paprika, chicken broth,
vinegar solids, paprika extract.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
I'm going to side with Subway on this, 50% is way to huge of a number and if they could pull it off then places like McD, Wendy, etc. would be doing it too in their products for increased profit. Also they wouldn't be able to even advertise it as chicken because if more than half is soy then it is a chicken flavored soy patty.
You can list your food however you want as long as the public is blind to it. Companies change formulas to products all the time. Having one with 40 or 50 or 60 percent soy makes no difference if nobody important questions it. You can take quorn, for example. It tastes like chicken and you wouldn't know the difference on your own devices. I don't think there exists any allergy to quorn so it's a great substitute and you don't have to worry about customers reporting being sick after eating it. See I just changed a formula.
Last edited by Barnabas; 2017-03-19 at 03:00 AM.
I wonder if they tested the chicken plain or with the added sauce that the teriyaki is coated in.
They claim their chicken is "made from" 100% chicken, not "made of".
My kitchen table if made of wood. My piece of paper is made from wood. That makes a huge difference in the legality of the claim.
CBC claims to have done 2 separate tests tests after noticing the glaring difference between soy levels in Subway when compared to other fast food restaurants. It shouldn't be hard for Subway to refute their claims.
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)
Labeling requirements are actually a hotly contested thing by food manufacturers. One example is Dinty Moore beef stew. They had to fight HARD to make sure "beef" was the first word on the ingredients list, instead of water.
- - - Updated - - -
See the link I linked above.
Sigh you could've just clicked the download link.
The chicken has soy. Funnily enough, you are wrong about the bread. It does not have soy. It has highly refined soybean oil which does not cause allergic reactions, and is not classified as a "soy product".
That's why the Italian Bread has a * instead of a bullet in my original picure..
(This signature was removed for violation of the Avatar & Signature Guidelines)