Read your own words. I dont knpw hpw so many people can have this foolish believe that paying people to buy your stuff someone makes you better off. Also, this idea that there will be sentient robots doing everything is extremely far off, if not far fetched. We have no concept of how to create consciousness, at all. Robots for the most part still require humans to perform the tasks, and there are an extremely large number of jobs that still are robotized, let alone will be. There is no reason to talk about when skynet takes over well before we are a fraction of a step in that direction, and we certainly dont need a UBI in advance of it.
All this is is a hairbrained plan to shove more communism dpwn peoples throats. This world is not egalitarian, and that isnt a philosophy most want to live by. You'll make this shit happen over many, many dead bodies.
I know I'd be an entrepreneur with basic income. Or I'd go back to uni and study in a STE(M) field to do research to advance society.
Meanwhile, I'm slaving away in your typical business job without real impact. Is this a better, more fulfilling life? My job is challenging, I'm learning as a human being, but what is the purpose of what a lot of us do? It's relatively meaningless, a lot of us work in sectors/businesses that have invented a product/service and don't really add objective value, just subjective value.
I work in the travel industry for a large tour operator. We sell holidays (like a bazillion others) and offer peerless service (where we add value). However, any customer who has half a brain can do without us and organize his holiday himself, and solve issues by himself. People are lazy though, which is why we dominate the market.
If I was more aware of all of this when I was in high school, instead of being focused on football & girls, I might have studied something else right from the start. Then again, so many people who study a STEM field end up in the same meaningless jobs as me.
People suggesting we come up with pointless jobs for everyone to do and actively make ourselves more inefficient by barring companies from automating seem to be advocating what Soviet Communism did.
The Soviet Union was great at forcing people to be hired for pointless jobs and generally being massively inefficient.
It also tanked their economy super bad.
The most realistic and likely solution to the eventuality of mass joblessness is probably just to kill all the poor people. The rich hold all the power and all the cards and that's the best option for them personally. I'm reasonably confident they'd rather engage in mass murder than be taxed at higher rates to pay for useless, excess poor people to exist. Maybe a nice form of murder like herding them into ghettos to starve to death. The rich can then soothe any flickering pangs of conscience by talking about how lazy they all are and how it's definitely not their fault the poor have no money for food.
Universal basic income doesn't have a chance, the rich and whatever remains of the middle class would never stand for it.
Last edited by Nitros14; 2017-03-28 at 08:27 AM.
Well, it didn't take long for someone to advocate a global genocide.
Seek help, I mean it. Social pariahs like you are dangerous to society as a whole, since you have no clue how it works and empathy is a completely foreign concept. Real life is not the video game you're addicted to.
Last edited by mmoc112630d291; 2017-03-28 at 08:29 AM.
In a society where automation does everything, mentality will be different. People will have more time to spend on arts, sciences, better themselves mentally and physically
(ancient greeks were saying "healthy mind in a healthy body"). Philosophy, mathematics, sciences, music, poetry, literature, inventions, space exploration! Mankind will thrive and people that sit all day doing nothing will be shunned and shamed
There will not be a need for a basic income, you don't need to pay a robot! Robots mine raw materials, robots farm the land, herd the cettle and bring foods and services to people FOR FREE. Robots don't need money, why would you pay a robot.
I'm saying that the worker should control the means of production, so they wont fall behimd.
Tell me what happens 30 years after UBI has been implemented and some disaster strikes, UBI can't be supported anymore. No one will have jobs, mentality or skill to perform anything in society.
Well, they should.
This is what they did in Amsterdam, right? Norway is also discussing if they should add a so called "Citizen's Wage"
But I guess this would not work for huge countries.
A few rich people have said things good about it.
I remain reasonably confident most rich people would rather see a lot of poor people starve to death than have significantly higher taxes. What happens when there's so many people on welfare the system breaks down? You have more faith in humanity than I do.
I prefer promoting well paid 3 day work weeks so everyone still feel they have a purpose and contribute.
I remember some rich dude suggestion having the system be 30 hour work week with 10 hours a day.
But base income might be a good system to make low paid jobs still feasable.
Still issue what to do with low skill workforce.