Was about to make a similar point. The most disturbing part about the conversation is people honing in on the "drunk" aspect rather than the important part: Consent. Saying, "You can't consent when drunk" isn't just stupid, it's fallacious. Trying to apply subjective levels of intoxication to the ability to consent negates the aspect of consent altogether. If someone is so drunk they actually don't have to faculties to be able to decide whether or not they want to have sex, they're more than likely unconscious or just about to pass out, which inherently negates any affirmative consent. If someone is drunk, can talk and says no, it's rape. If someone is so drunk, they can't talk or they're unconscious, it's rape. If someone is drunk and consents, it's not. It's not a difficult concept.