I think most people that would defend 18 as a number would do so on the basis that there has to be some semi-arbitrary age for legal adulthood across the board. Putting it at the age that people graduate high school and are no longer subject to direct adult supervision on a daily basis seems like a reasonable starting point.
I think for working, driving, and sex, pretty much everyone agrees that we need a bit more granularity and to carve out some exceptions - "OK, you can drive at 16, but you need to go through a permitting process", "OK, you can work at 15, but you can't do really dangerous jobs or work more than X hours", "OK, you can have sex at 15, but not with people in positions of authority or people that are much older". This is going to inherently have some arbitrary numbers about what's legal and what's not. There are going to be things that seem kind of morally wrong, but are legal and things that seem basically morally OK, but are illegal. That's the nature of how it has to shake out - there aren't perfect answers.
None of this remotely justifies anyone arguing that the dude from OP is fine though.
Why don't you link your research? I want to read research stating that if you are not into puberty at 18, you are not in 10th latest-puberty percentile.
- - - Updated - - -
You know what, I am done. You guys are free to fuck children, just make sure it's above legal age of consent...
Last edited by Kuntantee; 2017-04-15 at 05:22 PM.
@Bobblo
I am done here mate. You can call me whatever the hell you want. I am not the one who commented here with texts involving pedophilic tendencies.
Pubescent. Ready for sexual encounter. Spot the difference. Because I'd wager that being aroused by prepubescent children has to do with how they look and not the fact they don't bleed (that'd be the opposite of blood fetish, if there's any, I suppose) and appearance changes happen prior to first menstruation.
Edit: Also, like @Tota later said, it's not even readiness for sexual encounter but pregnancy.
I don't wanna get banned in a stupid thread like this. I am out!
The fact that you emphasized men is explicitly excluding women. That which does not apply to one does not apply to the other. What you mean to say is, "adults who sleep with children".
Having sex with a 13 year-old is not "defined as pedophilia". "Pedophilia" refers specifically to an attraction to prepubescent children. At best, this is a case of hebephilia and "child molestation" (depending on the laws of the region). Additionally, someone explaining to you how a particular word works does not imply that they support that behavior. Frankly, if you can't be bothered to use words correctly, you should just avoid using them.
Haven't you heard? Someone else's ignorance is clearly indicative of your own guilt.
Wait, Canada allows muslim male immigrants who are on Canadian welfare to fly over to some third world islamic country and marry 10 year old girls and bring them back to Canada as a "wife", yet are charging this guy for "sex tourism".
The Canadian government is literally giving money to muslim pedophiles to bring their victims back to Canada with them.
infracted - forbidden topics
Last edited by Crissi; 2017-04-15 at 08:29 PM.
I do not know who and why chose 18... It has been like that for ages and I am not arguing it is the best choice either. However, that is not even the problem with this story, IMHO. The problem is that she is 14 and he is 34: that is a huge age gap not only numerically but also and especially psychologically. The problem is exactly that when you were 15 you felt mature but in fact were not mature at all, at least not compared to a 30 and something year old. That is quite common among teenagers - feeling more mature than what they actually are thus easily falling prey of emotional manipulation and abuse.