The "reasonable" solution is that if you are going to force someone to be somewhere more than 8 hours a day, you should also feed them.
If your job sends you to a conference for a day they are required (by federal law) to pay you per diem.
Likewise, if you are going to force a child to be somewhere to learn (all day) they should also be provided a meal.
Lets ignore for a second, that in some cases the meal the child cannot pay for is often thrown out. But then they are required to work for... that meal... they didn't actually get to eat, to teach them a lesson about wasting? If that isn't ass backwards thinking I don't know what is.
Face value... that's child labor... plain and simple. Whether you think working for that meal... by scrubbing tables or picking up trash etc is a good idea. The kid should at the very least be able to consume said meal.
Last edited by A dot Ham; 2017-05-15 at 11:06 PM.
It's the social clime you get when those without are stamped as being "lazy leeches". Generations have fostered that attitude, so thinking it'll go away any time soon, especially when seeing how frantically some not-haves will defend the 1%, is too optimistic.
There won't ever be a "banish on poverty", the ones having enjoy their status way too much. Even wanting increased minimum wages as costs of living rises is labeled as "seeking welfare"...
You are technically right, but the school breakfast is ridiculously common and free is easy to qualify for.
https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/defau...Pfactsheet.pdf
"In Fiscal Year 2012 over 12.9 million children participated every day. Of those, over 10.1 million received their meals free or at a reduced‐price."
Schools should have free lunch, preferably hot, for everyone.
P.S.
Time to receive some hate.
Back when I was in school I just brought my own lunch. And I kept a few dollars in reserve just in case they had pizza or burgers or something I liked. There wasn't any standardized lunch...I had whatever I brought from home, and any additional stuff I got there was bought individually. If I wanted a piece of pizza I got a piece of pizza. If I wanted a burger I got a burger.
This whole thread reads like it's from another planet. I don't understand how anyone could oppose feeding children. They can't help their parents being poor, and food is not a luxury.
Also why is anyone in a first world country so poor that they can't afford food?
Why are there hot lunches in schools?
And wtf is wrong with a cheese sandwich?
I don't think this matters nearly as much as you think it does.
I really do feel sorry for those kids. If they're too poor to even get school lunch they probably don't have a very good home in the first place.
Sooo I guess just providing kids free lunches it out of the question?
Where I went to school, after elementary we just had a student ID number, and you'd punch that in to pay for it with money from your account. As far as I recall there was no way to check balance other than when you were paying for lunch, and to add more you had to bring money at that time. I actually forgot to get money all the time, and I honestly don't even remember them giving me a shittier lunch, I'm fairly sure I got nothing when I didn't have money. Usually had to bum food from friends, and repay them if they ever forgot.
When I was in school in the 90's, there was no free lunch. We had to pay for it. There wasn't anyone giving us anything. I mean I think it's stupid to throw food away, and I would've loved free food, nothing against that, but this isn't the end of the world. Tell your parents to give you some cash for fuck's sake. If they don't have money for food, tell them to stop wasting it on drugs. If your parents are such pieces of shit, try to reach out and get child services, or whatever it's called, to take care of this or something. We were poor when I grew up, and I always had food in school.