Flame on + A's Fury sounds amazing in theory, but the 2 legendaries makes it really limited. Leave out helm and A's Fury is crap, take out bracers and your single target will suck anyway -_-
Flame on + A's Fury sounds amazing in theory, but the 2 legendaries makes it really limited. Leave out helm and A's Fury is crap, take out bracers and your single target will suck anyway -_-
The fire legendary one is too niche.
(legendary's having a niche is fine, but its pushed too far here).
They are great, especially arcane seems quite OP. I am just wondering how they balance it towards existing legendaries, for example compared to sephuz you lose about 50% secondary stats and ~5% haste (if you are able to proc it at least every minute). This isn't even close to balanced and would once again make a clear BIS legendary.
On the other hand, perhaps we get those rings differently (as a quest reward maybe), so it would remove the luck factor. Still boring though to see one legendary set.
These rings are ok. Just raise the secondary stat to a "normal" value for such an item, and it will be worth wearing it.
Gloves are going to be shit for frost so this is going to be the second leggy to go whenever you can't benefit from shard of exodar and some kind of cleave is involved (with the other being bracers)
You think you do, but you don't ©
Rogues are fine ©
We're pretty happy with rogues ©
Haste will fix it ©
well, you prolly wouldnt have used the gloves anyway since you can use 3 setbonuses at once and the 2pc t19 just synergize really well with the t20 set but yeah, the value of the gloves just plummits with the TV nerf.
the new ring will be pretty meh if GS becomes a thing tho, as icelance isnt that high a source of dmg with that build.
Even if we could equip 3 legendary's don't believe the FO ring would ever be used in raids. Mayhap a DB Helm/FO ring/Scorch Belt combo for Mythic+ content.
You guys do know the ring you see is 910? And scaled to lvl 101?
I wonder how good this ranks for Arcane
Sylvaeres-Azkial-Pailerth @Proudmoore