Page 24 of 30 FirstFirst ...
14
22
23
24
25
26
... LastLast
  1. #461
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Um... you don't get to tell me what I am or not.

    Sorry.
    Yes I do. Because you do the same to me and others.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/864994472492453888

    Oh god, the desperation is so fucking real.
    This a fact finding question.

    When did Wikileaks become the enemy of the State?

  2. #462
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    Yes I do. Because you do the same to me and others.

    - - - Updated - - -



    This a fact finding question.

    When did Wikileaks become the enemy of the State?
    Well the guy that runs it is a known Russian shill.

  3. #463
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    I've been an anti-Obama person for over 4 years. Need I post every miserable thing I''ve said about that piece of work?

    He was a godawful failure of a man, but he was always legitimate, both in how he ran his campaigns and how he weilded power. The most illegitimate thing he ever did is bomb ISIS without a new AUMF from Congress, which is a very serious deal in my book.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    Your entire statement renders you unable to be Anti-Obama. At worst, a critic or skeptic.

    I mean "He's not my President" nonsense.
    @Skroe is an anti-Obama practitioner; always has been - especially on foreign policy.
    @Dextroden is saying that you, @Skroe, aren't a crazy-train anti-Obama frothing-at-the-mouth-where's-the-birth-certificate nut case. So you are anit-Obama, just not the kind he was referring to.

  4. #464
    Quote Originally Posted by Akaihiryuu View Post
    Well the guy that runs it is a known Russian shill.
    Ignore that. When EXACTLY did it happen? Like, what year or event occured. I recall Wikileaks being looked on with favor before both parties despised them.

  5. #465
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    Yes I do. Because you do the same to me and others.
    Wait... so you're somehow still operating under the assumption we're (broadly speaking) still somehow trying to be "fair" here or anywhere? With any of this? With Trump? With his supporters? Oh sweetheart.... I got news for you. Fairness went out the window ages ago. This is about inflicting harm on Trump's Presidency and retribution on anyone who enabled him. Because it's the right thing to do in defense of this country against an un-American President and supporters who betrayed our national principles. We are cheering the authorities and the media goring Trump and Trumpland.

    You can think what you like about my positions. I don't give a shit. You're a stage to stand on. Nothing more.

  6. #466
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/864994472492453888

    Oh god, the desperation is so fucking real.
    Uranium, you f-cking lefty.

  7. #467
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    Ignore that. When EXACTLY did it happen? Like, what year or event occured. I recall Wikileaks being looked on with favor before both parties despised them.
    Democrats flipped on Wikileaks after Assange showed up on RT with his own talk show. Republicans were in the same boat and only started supporting them again because they were the benefactors of their actions. Support of Wikileaks by Republicans also hasn't been a unanimous stance though and has instead been more of a 50-50.

    The IC has been calling them out on bullshit for years and has just now taken an official public stance on them over their actions with the US and French elections.
    Quote Originally Posted by Connal View Post
    From my perspective it is an uncle who was is a "simple" slat of the earth person, who has religous beliefs I may or may not fully agree with, but who in the end of the day wants to go hope, kiss his wife, and kids, and enjoy their company.
    Connal defending child molestation

  8. #468
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    This a fact finding question.

    When did Wikileaks become the enemy of the State?
    They're not, they're just boring Russian shills nowadays.

  9. #469
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Wait... so you're somehow still operating under the assumption we're (broadly speaking) still somehow trying to be "fair" here or anywhere? With any of this? With Trump? With his supporters? Oh sweetheart.... I got news for you. Fairness went out the window ages ago. This is about inflicting harm on Trump's Presidency and retribution on anyone who enabled him. Because it's the right thing to do in defense of this country against an un-American President and supporters who betrayed our national principles. We are cheering the authorities and the media goring Trump and Trumpland.

    You can think what you like about my positions. I don't give a shit. You're a stage to stand on. Nothing more.
    What does deciding people's political backings have to do with fighting Trump? Like, what even was the point of that post.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Bullettime View Post
    Democrats flipped on Wikileaks after Assange showed up on RT with his own talk show. Republicans were in the same boat and only started supporting them again because they were the benefactors of their actions. Support of Wikileaks by Republicans also hasn't been a unanimous stance though and has instead been more of a 50-50.

    The IC has been calling them out on bullshit for years and has just now taken an official public stance on them over their actions with the US and French elections.
    Thank you. This was the answer I was looking for.

  10. #470
    Quote Originally Posted by Dextroden View Post
    What does deciding people's political backings have to do with fighting Trump? Like, what even was the point of that post.
    You were making a point about fairness: I was doing something so you should do something. I'm saying I don't care remotely about fairness in this case.

    Anyway...

    Mueller and Uranium.... Assange is nothing if not a one trick pony at this point.

  11. #471
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    You were making a point about fairness: I was doing something so you should do something. I'm saying I don't care remotely about fairness in this case.

    Anyway...

    Mueller and Uranium.... Assange is nothing if not a one trick pony at this point.
    They're not even trying to hide shit at this point and people still support them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Connal View Post
    From my perspective it is an uncle who was is a "simple" slat of the earth person, who has religous beliefs I may or may not fully agree with, but who in the end of the day wants to go hope, kiss his wife, and kids, and enjoy their company.
    Connal defending child molestation

  12. #472
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    You were making a point about fairness: I was doing something so you should do something. I'm saying I don't care remotely about fairness in this case.

    Anyway...

    Mueller and Uranium.... Assange is nothing if not a one trick pony at this point.
    Who said anything about fair or unfair? What the fuck happened? Did I accidentally trigger your patriotism subroutine?

  13. #473
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullettime View Post
    They're not even trying to hide shit at this point and people still support them.
    He should just change the wikileaks avatar to a photo of Putin at this point.

  14. #474
    Quote Originally Posted by Akaihiryuu View Post
    He should just change the wikileaks avatar to a photo of Putin at this point.
    How about Snowden? People like him still, right?

  15. #475
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    You were making a point about fairness: I was doing something so you should do something. I'm saying I don't care remotely about fairness in this case.

    Anyway...

    Mueller and Uranium.... Assange is nothing if not a one trick pony at this point.
    The US should make a deal with Ecuador, to get Assange.
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  16. #476
    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    The US should make a deal with Ecuador, to get Assange.
    American Latin American policy is so ham fisted and careless, and the Latin America desk at the State Department so chronically understaffed... the fact he's still there is more a symbolic of neglect than anything else.

    The State Department basically should double in size. The US has been kicking the ball in our own goal with Latin America for the past 20 years.

    Edit: I'm half Colombian btw. Been there and all that too. Family goes there all the time.

  17. #477
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    American Latin American policy is so ham fisted and careless, and the Latin America desk at the State Department so chronically understaffed... the fact he's still there is more a symbolic of neglect than anything else.

    The State Department basically should double in size. The US has been kicking the ball in our own goal with Latin America for the past 20 years.

    Edit: I'm half Colombian btw. Been there and all that too. Family goes there all the time.
    Maybe an accident can happen.

  18. #478
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    American Latin American policy is so ham fisted and careless, and the Latin America desk at the State Department so chronically understaffed... the fact he's still there is more a symbolic of neglect than anything else.

    The State Department basically should double in size. The US has been kicking the ball in our own goal with Latin America for the past 20 years.

    Edit: I'm half Colombian btw. Been there and all that too. Family goes there all the time.
    Taste the arepas... those are heaven incarnate.
    And well, if the US doesnt do anything, China will reap the current void of a powerful leader
    Last edited by Thepersona; 2017-05-18 at 08:24 PM.
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  19. #479
    Trump gave the most disciplined answer I've ever heard him give.

    And he looks constipated doing it. He wants to explode.

  20. #480
    Immortal Stormspark's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Columbus OH
    Posts
    7,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Skroe View Post
    Trump gave the most disciplined answer I've ever heard him give.

    And he looks constipated doing it. He wants to explode.
    What did he say?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •