Again, wat? And wrong even in regards to Draenei. They were manipulated into believing the Draenei were a dangerous enemy plotting the destruction of Orcs. Long before they consumed the blood for that matter. Hell, the war against Draenei began before the drinking of the blood.
If you remember, Garrosh also expelled all races he deemed inferior in the horde, and only kept the goblins because of their Engineering, and the fact they would sell anything for the right price. As to Blackmoore, I remember being Horde in TBC and watching Varian (known as Lo'gosh) fighting in the Arena in the Valley of Honor. So as someone stated before, In times of conflict no side is more good or evil than the other, and Good or Evil is ony determined by the Winner when Conflict is over. Don't think Conflict will ever be "over" in wow or there would be no more content for PvPer's.
Fact (because I say so): TBC > Cata > Legion > ShaLa > MoP > DF > BfA > WoD = WotLK
My pet collection --> http://www.warcraftpets.com/collection/FuxieDK/
The Horde is currently being led by perhaps the most evil living lore figure not affiliated with the Burning Legion or the Void, so...
You mistake Alliance with humans pre-Alliance or outside the Alliance.
The Alliance is SOME humans, SOME night elves, SOME dwarves, etc.
Not ALL of them.
But overall, I think the Horde - as Horde - did worse things.
Due to specific individuals within the Horde? Yes. But they did nonetheless.
Why did you create a new thread? Use the search function and post in existing threads!
Why did you necro a thread?
Both cherry pick to make the other one look worse.
Alliance talk about the orcs being the big badies, yet we see figures such as Saurfang talking about the regrets of the orcs that did those atrositites. I think the conversation he had with Garrosh in Warsong hold reflects that very well (http://wow.gamepedia.com/Varok_Saurf...n_Warsong_Hold).
The other way around i can think of the events of the sundering. I dont believe the night elfs were completely innocent here, but i dont know the details good enough to go into depth.
What you can say about the early alliance is that they were pretty racist, not based on much other things then not being the same as the humans. The way they handle the situation with Tirion and Eitrigg, How Garithos treated Kael'thas which were their allies at the time, and you can go read the ashbringer comic and see how alot of the silver hand viewed other races before they split to the scarlet crusade. That speaks volume to me.
Yet again, Now we see a United Alliance with several races working together.
Point being, no one is clean of bad acts. I voted alliance here, because i often see how alot of alliance are just pointing the finger at horde, claiming what they claim, jumping to conclusions, taking details out of situation to tilt the view of things. I might not be objectively or morally right here if we start counting horrific events on either side, but i sympathize more with the horde point of view on things.
I was hoping this was going to be between the super casuals and the elitists.
Horde vs Alliance is a tired grade school level idea to keep perpetuating over and over. All of the PvP storylines this expansion have been trite and horribly contrived. I'm hoping that the whole Army of Light story line eventually does away with it.
Neither is - it's a matter of perspective.
The worst side is the people who get too into the faction conflict in the first place and insist that is somehow good for the game to have a segregated player base.