It make sense the moment they bring it out live, kmon, they meta-justify the race-change with a tech-stuff of a gnome... i think it is not terrible, WoW has a lot of lore compromises, really. It's just a game.
Probably wont happen, you are right, but i was hoping to. IDK, like, 20 levels?Well, it's not going to happen. A slower leveling would only be detrimental to the game, since every expansion adds ten character levels to level-up through (Cata and MoP being the outliers with just 5 levels (which took roughly the same time as ten, tbh)).
Well, a lot of opinion i've heard are similar, so you can generalize some concepts like that. For someone doing adventure is also Mythic+25 something, for the adrenaline or the sense of "shit i've done that! cool". But there are some general concepts on the "sense of adventure".Actually, precisely because it is subjective, you can't generalize it.
Players vanish after they used the tool to Find Group, they dont talk, they basically just use the FG functionality to achieve something as fast as possible.This may sound condescending, but what's stopping you from asking that question the players you just grouped up with?
You can "instantiate" some areas to became different when the player is on a certain level or quest. You just have to "handle" the << i'm grouping with something on a different phase of the world >> but i repeat, WoW is made of compromises, this would not be a real problem.You don't get it. The areas would have to be "revamped" to have those new questlines added.
Giving what should be an extremely rare and epic and backgroundous item to everyone is not a way to give that epic feeling to someone. The system right now just makes Legendaries like very good Purples. In my opinion, obviously. I prefer the old system (quest for a common but unique legendary) or the other i mentioned before.I honestly don't like the idea of, out of a guild of dozens of people, only one or two get hand-picked to work on their legendaries, which would take several weeks, possibly months, to complete? Not a good idea, to be honest.