Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
  1. #101
    Old God Captain N's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Resident of Emerald City
    Posts
    10,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    And the consumer sees the higher prices and just buys less of whatever product the producer is selling. That still happens regardless if it's cheaper to produce in Mexico or the USA.
    Except a person will still continue to purchase the cheaper option in most cases -- So you're not really hurting the Producer in Mexico at all. As long as their product is still cheaper even with the tariff than the same item made in the US the cost is shifted right onto the consumer.

    You would have to create the same products in the US or import from another country cheaper than what is done in Mexico for this to damage the producer in any meaningful way for it to have the effect you're talking about.
    “You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X

    I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    And the consumer sees the higher prices and just buys less of whatever product the producer is selling. That still happens regardless if it's cheaper to produce in Mexico or the USA.
    except it's really not that simple especially when you are talking about trade goods, when Trump first got elected and the shadow of tariffs were around the dollars strengthened and the pesos took a pounding. If tariffs were to be instituted the same scenario would result in basically a massive discount for Mexico making their goods cheaper at the same time giving them a reason to increase price. Mexico does produce goods that we cannot grow here another variable to weight in. That's why there is no support for the tariff idea it is a blunt instrument that often has unforeseen consequences.

  3. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    except it's really not that simple especially when you are talking about trade goods, when Trump first got elected and the shadow of tariffs were around the dollars strengthened and the pesos took a pounding. If tariffs were to be instituted the same scenario would result in basically a massive discount for Mexico making their goods cheaper at the same time giving them a reason to increase price. Mexico does produce goods that we cannot grow here another variable to weight in. That's why there is no support for the tariff idea it is a blunt instrument that often has unforeseen consequences.
    There is no support for the tariff idea as a measure of protectionism, not as a method of raising revenue. The former is related to what you wrote, the latter not so much.

  4. #104
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    And the consumer sees the higher prices and just buys less of whatever product the producer is selling. That still happens regardless if it's cheaper to produce in Mexico or the USA.
    If selling to the US will decrease their profits, they simply can stop selling to the US as it would actually damage them. Your "the consumer doesn't need to buy it" also means "the producer doesn't have to sell it".

    In no reasonable scenario will the producer eat the tariffs.
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

  5. #105
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    There is no support for the tariff idea as a measure of protectionism, not as a method of raising revenue. The former is related to what you wrote, the latter not so much.
    Both actually there have been intense lobbying from both inside and outside the white house for the reasons I listed not to mention no one wants a trade war.

  6. #106
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayhem View Post
    If selling to the US will decrease their profits, they simply can stop selling to the US as it would actually damage them. Your "the consumer doesn't need to buy it" also means "the producer doesn't have to sell it".

    In no reasonable scenario will the producer eat the tariffs.
    Who are producers gonna sell it to?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    Both actually there have been intense lobbying from both inside and outside the white house for the reasons I listed not to mention no one wants a trade war.
    How does it challenge the idea of tariffs as a method of raising revenue? As for trade war, make some reason to put tariffs , Mexico will put tariffs on another thing and will challenge US tariffs. It will take 3-5 years until the case is resolved, by that point the revenue of the tariff would've paid the wall.

  7. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    How does it challenge the idea of tariffs as a method of raising revenue? As for trade war, make some reason to put tariffs , Mexico will put tariffs on another thing and will challenge US tariffs. It will take 3-5 years until the case is resolved, by that point the revenue of the tariff would've paid the wall.
    You are right I misunderstood tariffs as a binary metric do raise revenues but the problem is unintended consequences and the fact that it makes the American people pay for the wall not Mexico.

  8. #108
    Banned GennGreymane's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wokeville mah dood
    Posts
    45,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Seiko Sora View Post
    And Americans will pay for it.
    Damn right we will.

  9. #109
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    Who are producers gonna sell it to?
    No one, they will reduce output.
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

  10. #110
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayhem View Post
    No one, they will reduce output.
    So they accept they are selling less. I'm not sure where we are disagreeing.

  11. #111
    The Unstoppable Force Mayhem's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pending...
    Posts
    23,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Mittens View Post
    So they accept they are selling less. I'm not sure where we are disagreeing.
    On them paying the tariffs.
    Quote Originally Posted by ash
    So, look um, I'm not a grief counselor, but if it's any consolation, I have had to kill and bury loved ones before. A bunch of times actually.
    Quote Originally Posted by PC2 View Post
    I never said I was knowledge-able and I wouldn't even care if I was the least knowledge-able person and the biggest dumb-ass out of all 7.8 billion people on the planet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •