View Poll Results: Would you support an estate(death) tax of 75%?

Voters
276. This poll is closed
  • need more info

    21 7.61%
  • Yes 75%

    41 14.86%
  • No but 50% is okay

    16 5.80%
  • No estate tax is good

    198 71.74%
Page 12 of 19 FirstFirst ...
2
10
11
12
13
14
... LastLast
  1. #221
    Quote Originally Posted by shaunika123 View Post
    except why would you EVER work harder to provide for your children after you die if it's taken away when you kick it?
    you'll just work enough and then get rid of all your money one way or another before you die

    it's money you already paid taxes on, so yeah it is effectively double taxation

    the whole point of being wealthy is that you can spend it on your children
    and your kids do get most of what you leave behind, current estate tax is 40% minus deductions and doesn't even kick in till after the first 5 million dollars (10 is a couple)

  2. #222
    It's very telling that the people screaming loudest for a meritocracy demand that rich people be allowed to leave their entire fortunes to their descendants, who have done nothing to earn it.

    They already received the full benefits of wealthy upbringing: education, freedom from hardship, etc. Surely these young gifted people don't need further assistance.

  3. #223
    Quote Originally Posted by Knarg View Post
    It's very telling that the people screaming loudest for a meritocracy demand that rich people be allowed to leave their entire fortunes to people who have done nothing to earn it.
    hey i worked very very hard to make sure i was born into a rich family thank you very much

  4. #224
    Quote Originally Posted by Canpinter View Post
    hey i worked very very hard to make sure i was born into a rich family thank you very much
    Exactly.

    Also, edited my quote for clarity.

  5. #225
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubcap View Post
    When you die your estate has to pay an estate or "death" tax. Republicans coined the term "death" tax and they've been working hard to reduce it. For example, only 2 out of a thousand estates have to pay any estate tax now.

    https://www.cbpp.org/research/federa...ral-estate-tax

    It's an ideal tax because the person you're taxing is dead and won't care.

    Why pass on all that wealth to children who might not be as capable? Redistribute the wealth and let it fall into more able hands.

    We can use all that money to ease the tax burden on the poor or for whatever.

    Warren Buffet is for this idea.
    The government taxes you for your whole life on your salary, home, car, other items, gas......... (I could go on but you get the picture).

    What gives them the right to come when you die like grave robbers and take 75% of your estate (or tax your estate at all)?

    They already taxed all of that stuff when you originally purchased it- why should there now be an additional tax on it after you are dead? So the military can buy another 10 million dollar missle to shoot at some terrorist driving a 10k dollar pick up?

    That's just crazy.

    That money should go where you decide. It is your money and the government has already taxed it.

  6. #226
    Estate tax should be low or non-existent below a certain amount. However, if you have more money than can reasonably be spent in multiple lifetimes... island buying aside.

  7. #227
    Deleted
    Even the idea seems absurd. Your wealth doesn't belong to the state, it belongs to you, so it should go to whoever you wish it to go after you die.

  8. #228
    Hell no. As several others have said, its double dipping. Secondly, who gives a shit if their children are less "capable". They still have every right to leave stuff to their kids. They shouldn't be penalized because some parents are losers and shouldn't have bred in the first place.

  9. #229
    Quote Originally Posted by Alydael View Post
    The government taxes you for your whole life on your salary, home, car, other items, gas......... (I could go on but you get the picture).

    What gives them the right to come when you die like grave robbers and take 75% of your estate (or tax your estate at all)?

    They already taxed all of that stuff when you originally purchased it- why should there now be an additional tax on it after you are dead? So the military can buy another 10 million dollar missle to shoot at some terrorist driving a 10k dollar pick up?

    That's just crazy.

    That money should go where you decide. It is your money and the government has already taxed it.
    again its not you paying the tax its the person you leave the money to. just like i have to pay taxes on the money my boss pays me even tho he payed taxes on it when he made it as well. estate tax is just a specialized form of income tax

  10. #230
    Old God Milchshake's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposter Burn Out
    Posts
    10,048
    As an aside. When Trump passes, I'm not sure there will be enough popcorn for the ensuing drama. 5 children with 3 different wives, it will depend greatly on Melania's relationship with the older children and how iron clad the will is. Some of the nastiest probate fights I have witnessed involved similar circumstances.

    The lawyers will win for sure.

  11. #231
    Herald of the Titans
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    America, F*** yeah.
    Posts
    2,693
    Point is, you worked very hard to provide for them. Who has the fucking right to steal what you earned for your children to give to others whom haven't done shit? Also double taxation is bad and fucking stupid on a conceptual level.
    O Flora, of the moon, of the dream. O Little ones, O fleeting will of the ancients. Let the hunter be safe. Let them find comfort. And let this dream, their captor, Foretell a pleasant awakening

  12. #232
    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    Ah yeah, the myth of "work harder and you'll get rich". Never heard of a factory worker becoming millionnaire because he was dedicated.
    Regardless, if what your children receives is taxed up to 75 % (which would require an already pretty huge amount anyway), it means that 25 % would end up as pocket money. Which means if you get more, they will get more, just not all.
    I thought that was grade-school level of math here

    No it's not. Read what I just wrote.

    That sounds like a pretty transparent excuse to disguise greed under the pretext of generosity. Not very convincing.
    1. obviously this whole thing isnt about factory workers so stop saying BS
    the persons who this affects can easily do less to earn less (see someone else's reagan quote somewhere)

    except no, because if you thread the line below the cutoff then you can effectively give them the same without punishing them for daring to be the children of someone rich

    and no it's not greed, how can a dead man be greedy in the first place?

    you're the greedy and envious one for wanting my money(whether it be hard earned or not)

    punishing people for wanting their children to have a better life is just complete fucking bullshit

    i already payed the government the taxes for the money i earned, let me do what i want with it when i die

  13. #233
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubcap View Post
    Why pass on all that wealth to children who might not be as capable? Redistribute the wealth and let it fall into more able hands.
    How 'more able'? And why 'more able'?

  14. #234
    Quote Originally Posted by Alydael View Post
    The government taxes you for your whole life on your salary, home, car, other items, gas......... (I could go on but you get the picture).

    What gives them the right to come when you die like grave robbers and take 75% of your estate (or tax your estate at all)?
    The fact that during your whole life, you benefited from them.
    Or do you think that healthcare, law enforcement, justice system, labor laws, the ability to walk with the guarantee to be protected, the infrastructure that allowed these millionaire to get electricity and water for their factories and roads and rails to carry their goods, airlines where planes don't crash into each others and so on, just sprout magically out of the ground ?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by triplesdsu View Post
    Hell no. As several others have said, its double dipping.
    And these several guys have just said bullshit and were corrected about it. Now selective reading is a pretty strong force, I know, but it doesn't change reality.
    Quote Originally Posted by shaunika123 View Post
    1. obviously this whole thing isnt about factory workers so stop saying BS
    the persons who this affects can easily do less to earn less (see someone else's reagan quote somewhere)
    So basically you recognize that this "working harder to becomes richer" is BS.
    And please, Reagan on economics ? The guy who is mocked for his voodoo economics ? As a reference ? Please ?
    except no, because if you thread the line below the cutoff then you can effectively give them the same without punishing them for daring to be the children of someone rich
    That makes no sense. I get the feeling you have no idea how taxes work.
    and no it's not greed, how can a dead man be greedy in the first place?

    you're the greedy and envious one for wanting my money(whether it be hard earned or not)

    punishing people for wanting their children to have a better life is just complete fucking bullshit

    i already payed the government the taxes for the money i earned, let me do what i want with it when i die
    That's just such a pileup of clichés, it sounds comical.

  15. #235
    I am Murloc! Grym's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Somewhere in UK where there is chicken
    Posts
    5,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Canpinter View Post
    again its not you paying the tax its the person you leave the money to. just like i have to pay taxes on the money my boss pays me even tho he payed taxes on it when he made it as well. estate tax is just a specialized form of income tax
    Different.

    When your boss pay you your salary, you pay income tax. However, this is an allowable expense, meaning his company does NOT pay corprate tax on your salary.

    Gross profit less expenses (your salary) becomes profit before interests and tax, this is where it get tax.

    So your salary does not get double tax.

  16. #236
    who cares? like you mentioned, it only applies to very high value estates (which is why the rich senators want to get rid of it). At the end of the day, it doesn't mean much, but since it only applies to people who can afford to pay it, I would rather keep it than get rid of it.

  17. #237
    75% wouldn't be bad for the highest bracket.

    Something like:

    $0-5mn: 0%
    $5mn-10mn: 25%
    $10mn-25mn: 50%
    >$25mn: 75%

    Obviously brackets/percents can be adjusted (double all numbers for a couple).

    This allows the vast vast majority of people to be unaffected, and allow their inheritance to move as expected.

    For the tiny percent of people with massive estates, this encourages them to spend their money while alive (contributing to a more robust economy). For those concerned about kids/family not getting money from a business, chances are if it's worth more than $5mn, it's going to be incorporated, not a sole proprietorship. If it is still an SP, simply give your family a higher wage, and have them do what they want with it.

    If you die with a large estate, it should be broken up and returned to the society that made it possible, and prevents dynasty families from occurring, where one wealthy person made enough money to support several generations in extravagant lifestyles.

    Again, 99% of people aren't currently affected by estate tax (and should remain unaffected).


    The other benefit of a relatively large amount of estate tax being 0%, is to give some level of inheritance to the family.
    Let's run through an example:

    Tom & Mary amass an estate of $100mn.
    They have 3 children.
    With my proposed brackets, there is $45mn after taxes.
    Each child gets $15mn.

    Some are acting like the proposal is to take everything away, when the proposal is to reduce the size of the inherited estate in extreme circumstances.

    I don't personally see an issue with each child getting $15mn, but that's me.


    If you reduce it to a middle class inheritance, of around $1mn, with 3 kids, they each get $333k, since taxes wouldn't kick in.
    Last edited by God Save The King; 2017-07-19 at 10:15 PM.
    “You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me.”
    – C.S. Lewis

  18. #238
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamCity View Post
    75% wouldn't be bad for the highest bracket.

    Something like:

    $0-5mn: 0%
    $5mn-10mn: 25%
    $10mn-25mn: 50%
    >$25mn: 75%

    Obviously brackets/percents can be adjusted (double all numbers for a couple).

    This allows the vast vast majority of people to be unaffected, and allow their inheritance to move as expected.

    For the tiny percent of people with massive estates, this encourages them to spend their money while alive (contributing to a more robust economy). For those concerned about kids/family not getting money from a business, chances are if it's worth more than $5mn, it's going to be incorporated, not a sole proprietorship. If it is still an SP, simply give your family a higher wage, and have them do what they want with it.

    If you die with a large estate, it should be broken up and returned to the society that made it possible, and prevents dynasty families from occurring, where one wealthy person made enough money to support several generations in extravagant lifestyles.

    Again, 99% of people aren't currently affected by estate tax (and should remain unaffected).
    brackets are the worst thing you can do with taxes

    either make it static
    or make it lineary increase
    otherwise you're punished for barely going over the line

  19. #239
    Banned Glorious Leader's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In my bunker leading uprisings
    Posts
    19,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoranon View Post
    More like I am not greedy enough to want to become rich by taking from the dead and their grieving families.
    Send them fucking flowers for all i care. Dint act like you give a shit about s9mebody else.

  20. #240
    Quote Originally Posted by D3thray View Post
    Doesn't take being uber rich over one generation to get dinged by this. Take a few generations of frugality plus prudent investing (my great grand parents and grand parents). My parents only hit 6 figures at the very end of their careers right before retirement. We're not top 20% by income on any measurement.

    In my opinion people in favor of estate tax want a piece of generations of the work of my family. I can honestly say go screw yourselves.
    Hate to call you out on this but if your parents are in the 6 digits and plan on leaving you even all of that money, you're not effected by the estate tax.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •