“Life is and will ever remain an equation incapable of solution, but it contains certain known factors.”
Then you Still didn't read ok then I'll ignore your nonsense.
- - - Updated - - -
Not unless you hear voices in your head mine specifically. Uh no I don't care what you thought was stupid and suggest you wasted your time. Most intelligent people move to threads they do like.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2017-07-28 at 12:11 AM.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
Pretty interesting kind of wondered how that fit in Nazi Germany. Watched that film Final Solution and who was Jew not Jew and what not part confused the hell out of me. Just one of the applications I wondered about.
This amount of this or that who's mother or grandfather. Seemed convoluted much like most eugenics.
Last edited by Doctor Amadeus; 2017-07-28 at 12:17 AM.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Nazi Germany had their own methods of determining who was and was not a Jew. They didn't really use a strict genetic threshold in making their determination. If I recall correctly if 3 of your grandparents were Jews...that made you a Jew in their eyes.
Not really sure what that has to do with your question though.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
As people said you are technically a little bit more genetically like your mother mainly due to mitochondrial dna. There is also another important factor I did not learn about until I took a cellular biology class in college (I went for a bio minor), and that is epigenetic inheritance. It mainly comes from these factors I'm not going to go look them all up but I think the main one is methylization and these factors are often passed down at least partially and what they do is they either is they either make certain parts of your DNA coil more tightly or loosely when they are chillin in the cells lets say a certain part of your genome that codes for a certain protein is coiled more tight due to methylization it will express itself less. If I remember correctly these are passed down from the mother most of the time but can be passed down from the father. But yeah that and mitochondrial DNA are both pretty minor compared to your genome. I am not a scientist so I can't give better explanations or even numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if it was like 49.5% dad and 50.5% mom overall, but it could also be 49.999% dad I really don't know lol.
Signature deleted due to it violating the rules. Please read the signature rules for more info.
The way that this stuff manifests can be anecdotally interesting.
I have 3 siblings, one being a "full" brother, and the other two being half-brothers from either side.
Yet, out of that pool of siblings, the only ones that resemble eachother are me and the half brother from my dad's side. The other two look unrelated. My "full" brother even likes to quiz people about whether or not they think we're brothers when we're out together, and most people just don't want to believe it.
On a pure genetic level though, there's 4 parts to the answer. Most have been mentioned.
1. You get 50% from your father, 50% from your mother. Which 50% is completely random, as due to purposeful cross-overs even within chromosomes, the combination of genes you pass on to your children is completely randomized. So at its most basic, both parents pass on 50% of their DNA. So if you have a half-sibling, they'd be equally related to you, whether from father or mother's side. The other points I'll list are just smaller factors.
2. If you're a girl, you have 2 X-chromosomes. This is actually one more than is useful to the body, so one is practically completely deactivated. Which of the two is random, different within each cell, so overall you're still 50% related to each parent. But one cell may express more genes from your father's side, another more from your mother's side. You have 37.2 trillion cells, so it doesn't usually matter much.
If you're a boy, you only got one X-chromosome, which came from your mother. And one Y-chromosome from your father. As you only have 1, none are deactivated, so all the instructions for your body on that chromosome, you get from your mother. Such as color-blindness, now expressed in all your cells. Which is why that's a ton more common in men. There's a huge amount more genes on the X-chromosome than the Y-chromosome. So you're technically more related to your mother, as a boy. However, you got all of your male characteristics from your father. It's that small Y-chromosome that makes you not a woman. So, physically and often mentally, the effects are still very huge. So I suppose where you draw the equation there isn't just math, but also psychology and philosophy, and isn't 100% objective.
3. Someone smartly mentioned mitochondria. These are little energy factories within each of your cell with their own DNA. Mostly to deal with their own function. These do tip the total DNA inherited from parents back in your mother's favor, just a little. Though how much of an impact that has on who you are as a person has yet to be determined, as far as I know. Barring degenerative mutations that impair their function, anyway.
4. Children look more like their father than their mother. Statistically proven so. This likely has to do with bonding. It's proven that men are better fathers to their children, if they are genetically related. Even if they are unaware they are not related on a conscious level, it's proven that unrelated children are treated worse. And throughout the course of human evolution, investment of fathers in the lives of their children has been a positive factor overall to insure survival and fitness.
In other words, a mother knows a child is hers, 100%. But fathers are less certain. It's possible they are not. And investing time, effort and resources into a child not your is not genetically beneficial. So children looking like their dad is understandable evolutionary, as it reassures them they should invest in the child on a subconscious genetic level.
So again, physical appearance matters more to you than cellular processes, than you may conclude children get more from their father. Even if this isn't truly genetically so, and only skin-deep.
Short version: You get 50%. Everything's just as related. But it gets more complicated in the small details.
Last edited by Caerule; 2017-07-28 at 04:49 AM.
You get (on average) the same amount of chromosomal DNA from both parents.
Technically you get slightly more DNA from the mother though because of mitochondrial DNA (everyone inherits their mother's, short of genetic abnormalities), but it's pretty short - about 17k base pairs out of like 3 billion. Probably less than the random variation in the chromosomal DNA.
Yeah. In theory you could get the exact opposite set to your sister and have nothing genetically in common with her. At least in terms of the regular 23 pairs, you'd still have the same mtDNA.
I think that's incredibly unlikely though, since not only do you get one chromosome from each parent, they mix in the meiosis phase so you'd have to get not only the opposite chromosomes but all the opposite genes/alleles/etc as well.
Intro To Arguing With Your Buddy On The Couch.
It's kind of a bludge subject to be honest.
Thank you for the break down, and not just pasting a link. I have had this conversation with a few co workers, and it gets pretty interesting especially when some just recently had children.
- - - Updated - - -
Well my attempt was to make something interesting without it having to do with anything too political or about something overly negative.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah pretty much what I was kind of getting at, because now days with so many mixed families, I think it's odd when comparing siblings with one different biological parent.
I think I read somewhere about fraternal twins possibly being fathered by two different men, really can't remember where I heard that, but I wonder.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Dude, fucking censor that pic, there's children using this forum.
This is actually true. It's very rare, of course. Fraternal twins means something went off, and there were two egg cells released at the same time, instead of one. Other than twins originating from an egg cell splitting in two after fertilization, these twins are not identical, originating from different egg cells and different sperm cells. So there's 50% chance they aren't even the same gender. In case sperm cells of multiple origins are present, the resulting offspring may have different fathers.
Despite the relatively small odds of this, there are known examples.