Originally Posted by
Louisa Bannon
Gentlemen, and I use the term loosely, this isn't a tough nut to crack.
If a woman is under the influence, she cannot consent.
If she is unknown to you, you would be esp. foolish to move forward to sex.
Judge in this case seems to think he's god. His opinions about video footage seems to fly in the face of the uncontroverted assertion that the woman was drunk and could not therefore consent. Behaving inappropriately while drunk is fairly common and doesn't somehow give her the ability to grant consent if a drunk woman cannot consent.
Yet again, I don't understand social norms better post on MMO-Champ...