Status is not citizenship. You're trying to dictate immigration policy so that it benefits yourself. Being born into this country and being a citizen doesn't give you that right, but the systems that were created by the people that run this country give you the opportunity to express your beliefs. Which thankfully have the capacity to filter out nonsense like this on a political level (most of the time.)
But unfortunately, no. There are a lot of prerequisites after "being born in America" before you get to start preaching about immigration policy, let alone put any of those words into action. Being born here doesn't afford you the right to policy, either. Not to mention the metric of "being born in America". You can be born on a naval ship halfway across the world or on a military base in the middle of a hostile foreign nation and still be considered born in America. It's a completely coincidental type of citizenship, fundamentally.
There are no worse scum in this world than fascists, rebels and political hypocrites.
Donald Trump is only like Hitler because of the fact he's losing this war on all fronts.
Apparently condemning a fascist ideology is the same as being fascist. And who the fuck are you to say I can't be fascist against fascist ideologies?
If merit was the only dividing factor in the human race, then everyone on Earth would be pretty damn equal.
There is a ton of historical revisionism about the civil war, and many people (like Endus apparently) just distill it down to 'good guys vs bad guys'. Of course, its incredibly convenient when you can do this while also engaging in relativism on other issues. Its the same problem with people who constantly use the #notall rhetoric, then flip this to #zomgALL when it suits their political ideology.
My comment was only to counter the argument that there were clear 'good guys' and 'bad guys' in the conflict, to counter the revisionism that the war was some altruistic crusade to help people, because if you look at how the freed slaves were treated it seems obvious that this wasn't the case. I'm not going to speculate on what alternate timelines could have existed, I simply think we need more context whether we are looking at events that happened twenty years ago or two hundred years ago or two thousand years ago.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
What gets me is that the alt right wants to cry victim but then pulls this. Cville is a pretty peaceful town. The statue's removal was done through democratic process. Antifa and BLM weren't there battling them tooth and nail through the city.
They came to the town, protested the town doing shit democratically, tried to force their view on the residents, came equipped with body armor and weapons, and attacked bystanders, journalists, police, college students, and a fucking student clergy meeting.
They acted more like a terrorist insurgency. Invading a town, assaulting the residents, trying to force your will on the populace, and lashed out creating a huge brawl with police and counter protesters when told to get out. This is what fucking terrorist groups do to villages.
Yes, you are using force against them, that is an effect.
Sorry, you are a white nationalist, I hate to break it to you.
- - - Updated - - -
They were trying to start their own country, so that they could keep slavery legal. In the end, it was about maintaining the continuation of slavery.
nope, as no one is entitled to immigrate to the US. Stop taking applications, illegals caught are jailed right away and sent back where they came from. if they come in illegally, keep taking everything from them and sending them back to the point its not worth it for them to come back. Punish business' that hire illegals.
BLM didn't commit a terrorist attack. The Alt-Right did.
America is a country founded on ideas an principles. Explicitly in our principles, background and origin is irrelevant.
You're arguing instead for an ethno-nationalist identity state.
That is categorically un-American. You can say you want to make America an ethno-nationalist state. But that would mean cutting up large portions of the constitution and abandoning a countless number of our principles. It would not be America any more.