Most atm are trying to rationalize extremist behavior of white supremacists and concern trolling the left
I would say I'm moderate, after flirting with the Green Party for a bit. Both sides are constantly contradicting themselves.
Sometimes it really is fucking US vs Them, do you think we are talking about who likes Vanilla who likes Chocolate Ice Cream?
Do you really think the issue is that fucking simple and some how you come along and figured it out while the rest haven't.
Here is a Notion how about EVERYBODY is fucking wrong on everything including yourself for the first time in history and as information and humanities connection happens nearly faster than the speed of light.
I am serious what then?
As for your horse shit regressive label you can keep it along with your Classical Liberal fucking nonsense, because like that and everything else you really have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
Liberal Conservative, are meaningless without context and the perspective of where you are, so there is no fucking such thing as Classical Liberal or anything else. And as far as regressive, it again depends what you are regressive to as opposed to progressive for.
I am pretty god damn sure in the 30s Germany folks like your self would have called anybody warning about Hitler Regressive "Ah come on he just wants to make a few changes" Or how abut the 60's in the U.S the Civil Rights Era "This Dr King is a trouble maker, why can't people sit in the back of the bus or buy their own buses or Lunch counters"
You know because hell we need to progress as segregationist in some peoples eyes, yeah well fuck those people.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
the difference however is that the "far left" fringe elements are seen as retarded by everyone including the left, are summarily ignored by anyone and everyone is any kind of a position of power socially or politically, and have no real tangible connection to the general abstract of liberalism.
conversely, the "far right" have directly elected representatives and their rhetoric is at least tacitly (if not implicitly) embraced by the political right when it's not being outright presented as legislation to be made into law.
so yeah there's extremist fringe elements on either side of the ideology spectrum, but only one side of that has any representation within the political system or the broader cultural zeitgeist.
Unfortunately the extremes are the vocal minority in the age of unlimited internet and 24/7 for profit news.
So now we're stuck with the alt-right vs the regressive left. It's better to just tune most of it out as both sides are made up of idiots.
So you can't make a coherent argument to you give me a link to the classical definition of whatever made up bullshit you cling to in order to buy that you are whatever it is that allows you to fence sit and call everyone else out.
Should I link you the definition to the word "Pokemon" because I am sure that has about as much meaning as Classical Liberal in any important sense.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
The moderates are everywhere. Most are affiliated with the Democratic party at this point...and they larger fit the definition of your 3rd question if you take time to research what they actually put out. (Hint: you will have to look at actual legislation in lieu of the mainstream media 'he said, she said' "reporting"...in other words, actually do what you are asking in your 4th question)
In other words, your last question demonstrates that you have been fooled by a straw man argument / black and white fallacy argument.
Basically, there are no serious, large-scale left extremist groups in the US. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/u...-glossary.html
As for myself, I am an independent voter who does do his research. While I have voted for Republicans in the past, it has been almost a decade since the last time I've done that. Because, in researching the issues and the candidates, I'm finding that the Republican candidates, for which I have the option to vote for, say one thing, but do very different, and typically bad, things...far more often than the Democratic candidates.Researchers who study extremist groups in the United States say there is no such thing as the "alt-left." Mark Pitcavage, an analyst at the Anti-Defamation League, said the word had been made up to create a false equivalence between the far right and "anything vaguely left-seeming that they didn't like."
At this point, I have largely abandoned simple TV-based mass media as an information source beyond some event or another happened. They are about the drama, and not about the substance of the issues at hand. You will have to read large articles while thinking critically as even the best journalist slips from time to time.
Yes, I have stopped to think if centrist have a values. They don't none that I have ever come across maybe a few but typically they are named Ted Kaczynski and they live in the woods and liked to send gifts through the male once upon a time and write stories.
Just another asshole who reduced his life to shitting in the woods with bears thought that everyone else really gave a shit about his view on a world he gave up on. Sound familiar?
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis