You sure?
Because that's what i literally said.
Pretty sure all Alt-righters want's to end affirmative racism.but for wanting to end discrimination based on a characteristic that the people in question have no control over.
Pretty sure a bunch of black men were fired for being 'uppity' too.Yeah, and now you are comparing someone being MURDERED to someone getting fired because they decided to tell the world how they feel "the Jews should burn", something that will certainly scare off customers. Do you get that the comparison is, to use your term, "retarded"?
No it doesn't.It does. Clearly, you are incapable of reading.
That relates to an immutable characteristic, and that has absolutely nothing to do with what i said:That describes your analogy between coloured people and the KKK more than anything. Are you honestly incapable of understanding the difference between something you can change, and something you cannot?The simplistic understanding as 'just about what the government does' Is frankly retarded - Or otherwise the necessary logical consequent is that the KKK never violated any black persons civil liberties - Which is again, retarded.
Which has nothing to do with any characteristic, it has to do with this:The simplistic understanding as 'just about what the government does' Is frankly retarded - Or otherwise the necessary logical consequent is that the KKK never violated any black persons civil liberties - Which is again, retarded.
The simplistic understanding as 'just about what the government does' Is frankly retarded.
Very plain text.
Actors other than the state can, and do, chill free speech -
Are you free to do something if you suffer consequences for it? (the answer is No).Yes. Should they be able to do so without ever having to face any consequences? No
Cool - Then you aren't in favor of free speech.It makes nazi's, KKK and other shitstains that would otherwise spend every day spewing hate and acting like the waste of air they are, think twice. They can still spew their shit, but they have to live with the consequences, which is only right.
Like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79BCG5dL4WM
Or if were talking antifa like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d31ro8cBpfk
Face it hate crimes goes both ways..... and anyone who commits a hate crime gets a automatic 5 year added sentence under the hate crime statute.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Wonder what boston's statute is on masked assasilants..
This was posted on the_donald today and it raises a interesting question
http://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/t...ction18.2-422/
"it shall be unlawful for any person over 16 years of age to, with the intent to conceal his identity, wear any mask, hood or other device whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, to be or appear in any public place"
The violation of any provisions of this section is a Class 6 felony.
So basically half of the Antifa members in Charlettesville were committing a felony and the police did nothing to stop it. #ImpeachtheVirginiaGovernor.
I'm continuing to love the, "Ignore the Nazi that killed somebody, ANTIFA REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
So since everyone wants to call the left so tolerant..... And their protestors never do anything wrong.. Lets see what happens when you "protest" a Left rally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNegGEoohK4
Looks like Trump picked his side
Yeah, I know it might come as a shock, but I don't give a shit what you think about the matter.
You might have fooled someone with that BEFORE Charlotteville.
Yeah, and people used to drop unwanted babies in the woods to be eaten. Hey, the rest of us is discussing 2017, get your head out of 1930.
You bore me. Your inabillity to read and understand simple sentences also bore me.
Of course you are. Being free to do something doesn't automatically absolve you from the consequences of your actions. You are free to jump off a tall building, that doesn't mean that you won't suffer the inevitable consequences as gravity does what gravity does.
I am in favour of free speech. I am not in favour of freedom from consequences arising from free speech.
You however, are not in favour of free speech given that you want to be able to say whatever you want, without anyone else being free to react to what you say.
The media doesn't want people to see this.
They have already written the story about how peaceful the protests are:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/c...?event=event25
Call them Nazis, white supremacists or “free speech” advocates — whatever label you prefer, they were the hunted and harassed Saturday on Boston Common.
A baker’s dozen or so of conservative activists gathered forlornly on the bandstand in advance of a “free speech” rally whose true agenda stirred enough concern to shut down the city’s famous swan boats for what the mayor said was the first time in Boston’s history. Meanwhile, thousands of counterprotesters held signs, chanted some words that Anthony Scaramucci would appreciate, played music and did their best to demoralize the enemy. In that, they succeeded, as the tiny bandstand group left early. Those alleged “free speech” proponents who inserted themselves into the anti-hate crowd were surrounded amidst chants of “shame” and “Nazi scum.” During tense moments when shouting matches broke out, police protected the pursued from their pursuers.
Silencing hate was the point, the counterprotesters said. When I asked one young woman who carried a sign that said hate speech is not free speech to explain why she believes that, she said “Neo-Nazism is a call to action” and therefore is not protected speech. Violence is not protected, but there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment.
She traveled from Connecticut to participate in the counterprotest because “I’m not going to let Nazis come into New England,” she said. On one hand, that’s a worthy cause. On the other, the sight of a young man wearing a red, white, and blue helmet, encircled by a crowd of protesters screeching “shame, shame, shame,” raises questions about tactics. The last thing an anti-hate movement should want to do is stoke sympathy for those they identify as haters.
Hundreds of police were deployed to keep order. In the end, this was a mostly peaceful protest, marred by some scuffles and arrests. Of course, Boston has weathered many protests, over many causes, including, not so long ago, the fight over desegregating the city’s public schools. That was also about race and hate, yielding an infamous photograph — the Pulitzer Prize-winning shot taken by Stanley Forman of a young, white man lunging at a black man with the sharp point of a flagpole, with the American flag attached. That was 1976. It’s sad to think the division and racial tension behind it are still alive and well in so many parts of this country.
Boston’s protesters wanted to send the opposite message, that hate is not welcome here, that today this is a city of love and inclusion for everyone except Nazis. I just hope that by silencing their enemies, they don’t empower them and give them a louder megaphone than they had before.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn