Not surprising, wonder how much money they took for that decision.
US companies need to learn to follow the rules and laws of countries they want to operate in. Pretty basic. Pay taxes. Dont exploit your workers. Follow our standards for security / workers rights. Easy.
Taxi companies seem to follow the rules and deliver equal if not better service (never been disappointed by a taxi driver in my life) for a reasonable price.
Problem is if Uber was to pay taxes and good money to drivers they wouldnt have an unfair advantage anymore and it would probably be not worth to run such an buisness.
Last edited by lonely zergling; 2017-09-22 at 03:00 PM.
They will be back. The city of Austin TX Taxi Cab drivers thought they could ban Uber too by using lobby dollars to push them out. Didn't last very long.
more like "what kind of sex do you like to have? WHy isnt your bf here? Does he not pleasure you enough"
me"" please stop"
Driver: "You're pretty, you should be fucking my son." and other comments like that. Would not stop after I said stop
- - - Updated - - -
yeah, that was great. The companies that tried to take their place while following Austin's excessive regs fell on their face.
Have to also remember that Uber is the most lossmaking private company in tech history. This won't be doing them any favours.
My girlfriend and I don't really use Uber (Underground FTW!), but if I look at this from a purely 'safety and security' stand point (for the sake of this point I am not including the wholes taxes thing), here are two articles from the same source about a month apart:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6988286.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7037926.html
Now, I am assuming when they refer to 'taxi drivers', uber is not under that umbrella, but to refer the original article, it was due to "public safety and security implications".
They seem as bad as each other.
EDIT: Both articles are from April/May 2016, so if the figures have radically changed, my bad! I couldn't find more recent articles from the same source.
SECOND EDIT: The article does in fact refer to Uber, so completely ignore me haha!
Last edited by mmocf5062b794a; 2017-09-22 at 03:16 PM. Reason: Additional Info
They are banned here also .. as much as i like the idea of the model .. they do a horrible job handling it.
Issues here ....
* if you transport other people for a living you need a special insurance giving extra cover for those you transport. they claimed that they do not need this as the drivers * not doing it as a business but just going the same place as the passenger and that they are *just* paying for the gas ..... yeah right.
* refusing to give info about drivers income from driving for them, making very possible to evade income tax.
* refusing to control how many hours a driver work, here you can only work a car / truck for a max of 13 hours before you are required a longer time of rest. Uber refused to enforce this, making it a safety risk.
this and a few other minor things lead to Uber being banned here ( after be giving a year ! to sort it out. )
i am ok with this.
Can't believe so many are agreeing with this. Uber is actually capitalism done right. A new business model coming in and running great to the benefit of the consumer and pushing out the massively outdated and overpriced cab model. But nah lets allow cabs to keep their monopoly with their shit prices and worse service.
Uber works in 1st world countries
which london no longer is
Its the same as some nordic countries not having a guard for you to pay a toll but you still do it, its a matter of civility and social pressure