It would change everything, and probably he wouldn't come to a conclusion "i need to get gun illegally", depending on accessibility of guns around the country. So, yeah, guns being banned or at least hard to get and not being widespread would change literally everything
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
Yes, and how well does that work when they are in shipping containers, or in the backs of big rig trailers, buried in boxes with other metal objects? Not at all. You gonna make border patrol agents check every single box manually? It's much easier with drugs because they can, well, you know, use dogs to sniff out the drugs, can't do that with guns.
I'd wager becauseAlso, if it is so easy to make guns, why doesn't most every criminal have them in other countries that have banned guns?
1. Most other countries don't have organized (and sometimes very large) gangs of extremely violent criminals like the US does (or a prison system that breeds them), many of which are essentially at war with each other (which is where the vast majority of the gun violence in this country comes from), and therefore there isn't a demand for them.
and
2. Until like 2 years ago a CnC machine capable of milling out gun parts cost around 6x as much as they do now... The price of something dropping to ~$1,500 from ~$9,000 lowers the barrier of entry considerably... You can now get all the tools and machines you need to do this for ~$2500 total instead of ~$12,000
Last edited by Schattenlied; 2017-10-17 at 04:31 AM.
A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don’t have one, you’ll probably never need one again.
Please quote me were I stated my stance on gun control in the United States or what about me commenting on the absurdity of someone living in a literal war zone, of their own free will none the less, to comment on a very specific portion of violence in the United States means that I am okay with the ~37 daily gun deaths in the United States?
But if you want to be specific about the gun homicides, Mexico is still ~ twice that per 100k people than the United States, so yeah, your pancreatic cancer analogy is still trash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ted_death_rate
Additionally, I don't own any firearms and I do believe that the United States needs to stop catering to lobbyists but that they also need to crack down on the root causes of gun violence. Some of this includes but is limited to: not allowing stupid things like bump stocks to be legally made and sold but illegal to install; cracking down on private firearms sales not covered by the BHVPA; etc etc etc. So please continue with the ad-hominems and projections.
You did read the article right? At least 1 guy is a convicted felon, he can't legally purchase or own a gun in the United States. So, no, mental health checks do not solve anything in this scenario. Nothing other than removing access completely solves this scenario.
Last edited by bladeXcrasher; 2017-10-17 at 05:02 AM.
Yes they can:
http://forensicoutreach.com/library/...etection-dogs/
3. Concealed weapons and firearms.
Dogs can be trained to sniff out ammunition, and guns themselves, from the distinctive odour they produce. For dogs, the smell of gunpowder is particularly noticeable. Springer Spaniels are particularly useful in finding guns, due to their keen sense of smell, and well-known enthusiasm! Labradors are also utilised largely due to their ability to retrieve.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
they can sniff out guns that have been fired. whoopdedo, now truck in freshly manufactured firearms that haven't been fired and only smell like the metal they are made out of, the same metal the other shit they are packaged with is made out of, and the dogs are useless. Ammo doesn't need to be smuggled in because, as in every country that has tight restrictions on firearms, ammo can still be purchased in country... not to mention manufactured even easier and with far less machinery than guns themselves require.
Last edited by Schattenlied; 2017-10-17 at 05:06 AM.
A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don’t have one, you’ll probably never need one again.
The solution, obviously, is to start selling kevlar shirts in stores :P
If you were wearing a Kevlar shirt you would be less worried about the gunman in front of you, so your own gun would probably win the argument.
they generally test 1 or 2 out of a batch, as is the standard with most things that are mass produced... As long as a firearm passes a function check, which doesn't require firing ammunition at all, they will ship it... and if someone is illicitly producing guns specifically to ship over the border, they would just not test fire any of them. If these people have the capabilities to manufacture massive amounts of drugs, they are more than able to get the means to manufacture firearms. If there was suddenly a demand for them like there most definitely would be if they were made illegal, you can bet your ass they would start making and shipping guns right alongside their drugs, if not just set up to manufacture them in the US and bypass the border completely, since it wouldn't be difficult to conceal like drug manufacturing is.
They exist to make money, and if a market opened up that massive, that they already have connections to through selling their drugs, they would hop on it real quick.
Last edited by Schattenlied; 2017-10-17 at 05:49 AM.
A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don’t have one, you’ll probably never need one again.
It is terribly difficult compared to the current process of acquiring a gun AND it's also easier to police people creating guns than people owning guns. It's pretty simple logic, reduce the amount of guns created reduces the amount of guns available and therefor the amount of people that own a gun.
A gun is like a parachute. If you need one, and don’t have one, you’ll probably never need one again.
Here's a list of the 22 largest drug producing countries in the world. On your graph only one country borders one of those 22. (And happens to be a short boat ride from 3 more.)
https://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcr...ol1/238913.htm
The following major illicit drug producing and/or drug-transit countries were identified and notified to Congress by the President on September 14, 2014, consistent with section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-228):
- Afghanistan
- The Bahamas
- Belize
- Bolivia
- Burma
- Colombia
- Costa Rica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Honduras
- India
- Jamaica
- Laos
- Mexico
- Nicaragua
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Peru
- Venezuela
The U.S. has a drug crime problem. Gun deaths are only a symptom.
I sat alone in the dark one night, tuning in by remote.
I found a preacher who spoke of the light, but there was Brimstone in his throat.
He'd show me the way, according to him, in return for my personal check.
I flipped my channel back to CNN and lit another cigarette.
Lol of course a State Department Chart wouldn't list the US as a drug producing country. Its outside their jurisdiction.
It would also cast a bad light on rural white people that produce a fuck ton more meth or marijuana than the output of the Bahamas. Do not impunge their economic anxiety. Which they choose to self-medicate.
Was the first gun even real, theres no sound and there was no muzzle flash and theres no way you would miss from 6 feet lol