well by answering the questions the way I did
very pro military, pro religion and traditionalistic
for example one question was: what's more important the pursuit of peace or military strength? I voted military strength because it is what keeps that peace, but the test apparently considers that an extremely nationalistic thing to say
Last edited by mmocb78b025c1c; 2017-10-20 at 12:36 PM.
Generally, a small centralized government... no larger than is required to fulfill whatever duties they feel the state should cover. Emphasis on maximizing personal freedoms, even if this may mean that a system is not necessarily "equal" or "fair." This usually coincides with an emphasis on open, free markets with minimal involvement of the state in the markets, with the belief that a free market self-adjusts over time better than a government can make requirements and laws to force it into desired shapes.
Some forms of libertarian, usually the strong right-wing forms, advocate for the complete dissolution of the state... but that's not even remotely practical or realistic. The state plays important roles in most moderate forms of libertarianism, even when it concerns the markets, especially where natural monopolies tend to occur - the free market can't really self-correct unless consumers have equal access and ability to choose from a wide variety of competing businesses in the same market. Power, water, and other utilities are usually seen as being best handled by the state, because the amount of capital required to start up a new, competing firm in that market is staggering and will be prohibitive in nearly all cases. The US could probably also add telecom (phone, internet, etc) to that list, because most of the lines and land are owned by a handful of corporations and building lines of your own (let alone purchasing the land or the rights to run lines through someone else's land) is horrifically expensive.
To state the obvious, Wikipedia is not appropriate for high-level analysis of political theory. It is like trying to learn about art from a colouring book.
Fascist scholars mostly reject policy attribution as a component of fascist regimes because there was little consistency on policy. The consensus revokes around the definition of fascism as being mostly iconic, stylistic and psychological.
In practice fascist regimes were hands-off economically outside of war industries. If that were considered interventionist the US would also be seen as interventionist since it has the largest governmental military expenditure in human history.
- - - Updated - - -
The lack of self-awareness inherent in that sentence is impressive. You are almost literally quoting parody.
Is everone (almost)on this board a Libertarian Socialism?
I will need to go deliver my Party card since I got Libertarian Socialism, wich imo is quite wrong.
Last edited by God Save The King; 2017-10-20 at 04:18 PM.
“You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me.”
– C.S. Lewis
my result, is it good or bad?
Such a vague test
I'm a filthy fence sitting centrist.
That authority are way to high, had to vote keeping garbage cultures out.