Mega-Thread: Mueller investigation

[Cthulhu 2020]

As predicted, no Collusion in the indictment and very little facts that actually lead back to Trump. This will all lead back to Uranium one.

I take it you failed english class in elementary school and had someone else type this post for you?

Everything you claimed is not there... is there, right in the indictment. There's no direct link to Trump, but there's lots of direct links to most of Trump's staff. And what do you think links to almost all of Trump's staff means?

I do glean great amusement from all of the Trumpkins trying to screech about the Uranium deal, as if Clinton was the orchestrator. Their ignorance of what happened is adorables.

[mvaliz]

Before I go, one more thing.

We literally had a thread in the last week, where the consensus among anti-Trump and "the left" was "if anyone in the Clinton campaign did anything illegal, lock them up".

I think @lockedout started that thread in one of his typical badly informed shitposts? Yeah it didn't quite work out for him. He scurried out of it.

Fact is, anti-Trump is largely apolitical, but pro-Trump is so fixated on Tribalism (how ironic), that they can't see it.

But your fundamental issue here Tony is that you can go look at the thread, but the same people you're saying "this so much lol" about, they already said what their response would be: Podesta commit a crime? Lock him up and throw a way the key.

The left's commitment to justice is far deeper than the faux-conservatives / extremist right. By that thread alone they show it. Trumpkins have spent a year trying to obfuscate and downplay an investigation which has already yielded a felony guilty plea, while "the left" as you call them, in one thread, made clear that you can fry any Democrat who did wrong.

Okay really headed out now. But stew on that a little. You're on the wrong side. And there are only two sides.

The problem with Tony right now is really a nutshell problem with the Dumpsters who took over your party. It's not a matter of policy for them anymore - it's a matter of "keep librulz out at all costs!"

Why do you think Tony keeps banging on in this thread about Manafort's remote possible connection to Podesta (and thus somehow the DNC entirely) than, you know, HIS VERY VERY VERY REAL CONNECTION TO OUR CURRENT PRESIDENT WHO IS, RIGHT NOW, RUNNING THE COUNTRY!

Both are priorities, but he's displaying what appears to be a COMPLETE lack of interest in our POSSIBLE ACTUAL CORRUPT SITTING PRESIDENT than a remote DNC member. There's a reason for this...

What's more important to him is that he sees where all of this is going... He knows Dumb-Dumb Dump is going to go down, and he sees it's going to hurt the image of the GOP to the point where "evel librulz" may take over in 2018/2020.

Simply put - Tony (and people like him) despite hating Dumbass Dump, would rather have a corrupt vile despicable Russian-owned bully like Trump, a person who destroys all of the virtues our country stood up for and compromises the values of BOTH parties - even his OWN values to some degree, in the white house than to have a Liberal. He's like an extreme arachnophobe who would gladly burn down his own house and entire neighborhood if it meant he can believe it was free of spiders. I really wish I knew what it was in his past that traumatized him to hate liberals in such an unorthodox extremity (Maybe an ex who left him for a liberal whom she felt was "kinder" than him or something? Maybe he had a particularly abusive father who constantly "Beat the Librul" out of him? I dunno...)

You, Skroe, of course see the very real possible tarnishing (or rather, inevitable implosion) of your party name as well - but unlike Tony, you welcome it knowing you can possibly restore it back to being some semblance of what Abraham Lincoln intended it to be. You know the other side isn't going to destroy the country like Dumbass Dumb-Dumb would. It might adjust our position in the world to a way you may not like, but it won't compromise everything we stood for and our forefathers created. The same as (/spit) Mike Pence would try to undermine most of what the 1st world countries are achieving, but at least we wouldn't have him doing all that WHILE ALSO trying to start World War 3 and cooperating with the old-school KGB for creating a selfish-ruled "fuck free speech" Klan-Loving dictatorship all while having his angry little mind shift around constantly the moment somebody farts near him triggering a toddler tantrum. >_<

[jdbond592]

Suddenly the guy with greatest memory of all time is forgetting a lot of names..

[alexw]

In fact nowhere does it say that he was "sent by the Trump campaign".

Only that he did brag about it and drew interest from Russia-connected "Professor" while he was aware of his future position, and then tried to facilitate meeting while he actually held that position. Meeting that never actually happened.

I suggest you read this -

https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/for...n-their-boots/

[Breccia]

Not guilty, huh? Fight the good fight, Manafort, those money laundering charges will leave you with nothing but your tainted career to keep you warm at night.

Wonder when the nice public trial will be?

[Sky High]

So no collusion but still going after that witchhunt, yea Democrats are not that dumb they still want at least 30% of the vote in 2018.

who the fuck cares about collusion at this point? I'll tell you it's all projection on the Dems part but Donny boy is still a fucking moron. the facts are at this point Trump tried to bury this investigation and that's all you need to go after him for that. you bleating about "witch hunts" only fuels the collective laughter.

[Machismo]

Actually, you are commenting on something entirely different than what Antiganon was discussing. I wish you'd pay more attention. Remember, if you're confused, just ask! We're all here to help you.

Nope, sorry. I was trying to correct him.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Gotta love the timeline.
1) There was no collusion. Russia is something you made up because all of a sudden Russia started hiring Assange and running ads using stolen emails. They didn't actually hack the machines, therefore, no collusion.
2) Oh yeah? Then how come we haven't seen any evidence of collusion? The investigation's been going for one-quarter the length of the Nixon one, and no evidence is available to the public! Nothingburger!
3) They why didn't they press charges sooner?
4) Yeah, but some of the charges are things Manafort did before the campaign, before he was hired by Trump.
5) I don't see collusion in the charges.
6) They didn't charge Trump personally.
7) But her emails!

"But her emails" should have been first AND last.

- - - Updated - - -

Mu narrative.

Ok?

If Podesta is corrupt lock him up with Trump and the rest of his staff.

The attempts at deflection from the collusion among the Trump campaign are hilarious though.

[Breccia]

Mu narrative.

Wrong thread. There is a thread about Podesta, which this isn't.

Also, I can't help but notice no charges were filed against Podesta or the DNC. Trump's campaign manager, by contrast, was in court today. Take all the swings at Podesta (in the correct thread) all you want. They might eventually result in an indictment, who knows. Team Trump? Three so far. And one of them plead guilty.

- - - Updated - - -

"But her emails" should have been first AND last.

It literally was.

[alexw]

Papadopolous was resident in the UK when he made the approach to Trump. His Russian contact was the UK Ambassador Yakovenko and 'Putin's Niece'.

Interesting that Nigel Farage of UKIP met him in 2013...

There seems to be a nexus connecting Trump, Farage, Russia, and Assanage all together.

[Antiganon]

Mu narrative.

Washington lifer might have done some illegal shit? And he might go down as a result of Mueller's investigation?

Sounds like one less Washington lifer doing illegal shit to me.

Pretty sure that's a win to everyone who doesn't like people in Washington doing illegal shit.

[cubby]

Nope, sorry. I was trying to correct him.

Don't apologize to me - apologize to him. He's the one you wronged with your misunderstanding of what he was talking about, not me. I'm just pointing out (again) your immense inconsistencies and lies. You're welcome.

[Shalcker]

Hey, i found this and thought i would share.



Easy way to make it about Clinton for Republicans!

"Manafort took money from Ukraine. Guess who also did that?"

[Antiganon]

I have to say, I much preferred the other thread.

[Machismo]

Don't apologize to me - apologize to him. He's the one you wronged with your misunderstanding of what he was talking about, not me. I'm just pointing out (again) your immense inconsistencies and lies. You're welcome.

Once again, youa re wrong. I was trying to correct him, He was referring to you coming and trolling from the other thread, not the thread that got shut down because it is the same as this thread.

- - - Updated - - -

Hey, i found this and thought i would share.



Easy way to make it about Clinton for Republicans!

"Manafort took money from Ukraine. Guess who also did that?"

Great, throw her in jail with Trump and his cronies.

[Enjoiskate]

Hey, i found this and thought i would share.



Easy way to make it about Clinton for Republicans!

"Manafort took money from Ukraine. Guess who also did that?"

wonderful..so how is this even relevant to Mueller filing charges?

[Shalcker]

Great, throw her in jail with Trump and his cronies.

This battle of spiders in a jar is going to be fun!

[Kujako]

Hey, i found this and thought i would share.



Easy way to make it about Clinton for Republicans!

"Manafort took money from Ukraine. Guess who also did that?"

OK, so we wont elect Clinton. Now what?

[cubby]

Once again, youa re wrong. I was trying to correct him, He was referring to you coming and trolling from the other thread, not the thread that got shut down because it is the same as this thread.

Wow, no he wasn't. If you click back on the posts he was quoting (did you know you could do that? just ask if you're confused) you can see he was talking about someone coming in from the closed thread on the Mueller indictments.

Again, just click back if you don't get it.

I have to say, I much preferred the other thread.

Here, @Machismo, in case you needed more help understanding.

[alexw]

Still no evidence that Trump was involved, if there were, it would most certainly have come out of the Manafort indictments. Sorry to kill the narrative.

??????

Why would it?

Muller is treating Trump and co as a crime family. Ergo you start at the bottom and work your way up to the crime boss at the top of the family. So why on earth would we expect to see evidence of Trump involvement at this early a stage? Your comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.