I really hope this isn't another faction war, it's boring and over done, the fact the games an MMO means no faction will truly win. Not to mention why the hell would the LOA say Sylvanas is the one to save us if she fucks off to start a war.
Is it too much to ask to have the alliance the bad guy for once? The last time anything similar like that happened was in Wc3 with garithos, we really could use some trigger happy humans, preferably assassinating Sylvanas starting a war and then we could finally get a human themed raid.
Who can say, really. I'm hoping perhaps this is all some kind of feint as opposed to what it seems like outright, but I'm a bit too jaded to hold out a great deal of hope. I'm not really looking forward to more of the faction conflict, to be honest; I feel like its a vein that's been long played out.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
ı was certain to have an old godish expension next but it looks like pandaria 2.0
well pandaria is my fav expansion so here comes another legendary one
I can imagine a largish sub-set of people who might riot if that were the case, but I'm not really among them. I like Sylvanas as a character, sure; but I'm not beholden to her or anything - if she dies then she dies, I only hope she dies well (a better death than poor Cairne in any case).
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
There is no context as to the why the Loa said Sylvanas had to be Warcheif. Only that "Many would not understand"
So either it's just the laziest form of passing the buck or Blizzard's winking the elbow that Putting Sylvanas on the Podium was a step to something else down the road. Blizzard's been acting weird lately with it's writing so it actually has a possibility of being a long game setup
The Faction War 2.0, as told by our narrator the Ogre Hamfist.
Sadly the Horde have done so many awful things it'd be hard to really blame the Alliance for acting Villanous agianst the Horde.
Horde have been so cartoonishly evil for no provocation for a long enough time for the Alliance to have a laundry list of legitimate Greivances that they have yet to collect on. Horde's one legitimate beef was Taurajo-and it was wrapped up rather nicely and even on the "agressor" end it was seen as a failure. It was a good conflcict-but short lived.
For the Alliance to be villainous would need a massive paradigm shift. And then there's the matter of making the Horde the Hero in the sceneario which...is a stretch
Basically, they got work to do before this can ever be a good sell.
yes, I love faction war stuff. and I love the Forsaken and Sylvanas