I don't know why anyone would think it's not ok. Except people who are racist against white people.
The bold statement is an oxymoron. If everything were actually handed to me, I would get my way.
But to say the term 'Black Lives Matter' is racist when we still have organizations like the KKK or Conservative Republicans causing far more damage and harm to our society sounds like you just don't like black people.
Sorry if what you sound like paints a picture as to who you are.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
Should've said IT'S OK TO BE A WHITE HETEROSEXUAL MAN for extra victim points! It's a serious plight
whoever said it's not ok to be white? claiming victimhood when you are not a victim is the problem here
This is the kind of Nazi hate crime that happens in TRUMP'S AMERICA!
It's not that it's not okay to be white. It's almost as if the colored people that have problems with white people that are racist against colored people and not the white people that are not racist against colored people.
Try not to be the white people colored people hate? Don't know why that's so hard for some of these white apes to understand, it's not like black people are going to culturally appropriate being a dick to everyone for no reason anytime soon. That's for white middle class kids that grew up with the internet their entire life reciting memes like they are bible verses.
Last edited by Blamblam41; 2017-11-05 at 03:51 PM.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
Table A-18 has the same data organized a bit differently at the original source.
Yes, I would accept a table from a DeRay McKesson article if it was appropriately sourced and I could easily access the source data myself.
I mean, are you seriously denying that medical schools give preference in admissions to blacks? It's not like this is a secret, it's just a fact that a lot of people find uncomfortable.