1. #9281
    Quote Originally Posted by Waaldo View Post
    Why can't we just hear both sides and move on?
    One of them is lying a lot.

  2. #9282
    Bloodsail Admiral Decagon's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Unfortunately, Central Utah
    Posts
    1,100
    I see. Thanks for the information. Cutting PBS seems to be a pretty arbitrary thing to support then.

  3. #9283
    Quote Originally Posted by Waaldo View Post
    First time watching the political debate here.
    Is it always so much "*Insert presidential candidate* is wrong blah blah blah, and I'm right blah blah blah?"

    Why can't we just hear both sides and move on?

    Edit: I get that it's a debate, but they seem more like they are name calling than debating imo.
    Because one candidate is lying like fucking mad.

    Oh look---he just brought up Solyndra. Of course he ignores the other 30+ companies that are doing fine.

    Oh---and he just basically insulted the President directly.

    Class act.

  4. #9284
    Oh look---he just brought up Solyndra. Of course he ignores the other 30+ companies that are doing fine.
    Did he bring up how everyone thought Solyndra was a safe investment?

  5. #9285
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Did he bring up how everyone thought Solyndra was a safe investment?
    It was until China basically cheated.

  6. #9286
    Titan Kalyyn's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Indiana, US
    Posts
    11,392
    Something I've never liked about these debates. I'm not a fan of Obama, but you do not tell the most powerful man in the world when he is done speaking. Heck, they should both be allowed to speak for as long as they want. I want to hear everything they have to say, not just what they can cram into 2 minutes.

  7. #9287
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Did he bring up how everyone thought Solyndra was a safe investment?
    HAHAHAHA. Sure. He definitely did. Definitely didn't make it seem like Solyndra was the only recipient of the 90 BILLION DOLLARS (Which I have no idea if it is even accurate, but Romney repeated it literally like 4 times in a minute) that he gave to the green energy industry.

    Oh look, Romney finally brought up the 716 billion dollars taken out of Medicare lie.

  8. #9288
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Did he bring up how everyone thought Solyndra was a safe investment?
    There's a position that exists (which I don't agree with) that simply says that investing in private businesses is not the government's place. If that were Romney's position, he might be able to articulate some reasonable point on Solyndra. With his position that investing in energy is a good thing, there's simply not plausible way to say, "ha, Solyndra!".

  9. #9289
    Old God Grizzly Willy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Kenosha, Wisconsin
    Posts
    10,198
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectral View Post
    One of them is lying a lot.
    I'm looking forward to the fact checkers then.

  10. #9290
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalyyn View Post
    Something I've never liked about these debates. I'm not a fan of Obama, but you do not tell the most powerful man in the world when he is done speaking. Heck, they should both be allowed to speak for as long as they want. I want to hear everything they have to say, not just what they can cram into 2 minutes.
    This is why I don't like debates, but would instead prefer a sit-down conversation style event.

  11. #9291
    Quote Originally Posted by ptwonline View Post
    It was until China basically cheated.
    Solyndra made a good product. They just bet the market would go the wrong way. They specialized in super high end expensive solar panels and the market, in large part due to China, went the other way. It happens.

  12. #9292
    Quote Originally Posted by Grokan View Post
    I'm looking forward to the fact checkers then.
    Unfortunately, fact checkers generally have a vested interest in faux bipartisanship.

  13. #9293
    Bloodsail Admiral Decagon's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Unfortunately, Central Utah
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by ptwonline View Post
    This is why I don't like debates, but would instead prefer a sit-down conversation style event.
    I have a strange feeling that a nonofficial debate in conversational form would result in them trying to kill each other.

  14. #9294
    Quote Originally Posted by Decagon View Post
    I have a strange feeling that a nonofficial debate in conversational form would result in them trying to kill each other.
    I'm not seeing the downside to this. Incidentally, this is possibly the greatest blog post ever -

    http://faceintheblue.wordpress.com/2...d-win-and-why/

  15. #9295
    I wish Obama would just call Romney a fucking liar.

    There he goes again stating the 716 billion dollar medicare lie.

  16. #9296
    Poor Obama, he's getting crushed tonight. Looks like the complete blathering idiot he really is.

  17. #9297
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottsdaleHokie View Post
    Poor Obama, he's getting crushed tonight. Looks like the complete blathering idiot he really is.
    I suppose the main takeaway from this is to realize that I may be experiencing the same level of bias. This really is absolute lunacy though.

  18. #9298
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottsdaleHokie View Post
    Poor Obama, he's getting crushed tonight. Looks like the complete blathering idiot he really is.
    Are you serious? Romney is fucking lying like crazy.

  19. #9299
    Old God Grizzly Willy's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Kenosha, Wisconsin
    Posts
    10,198
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectral View Post
    Unfortunately, fact checkers generally have a vested interest in faux bipartisanship.
    I'm interested in seeing evidence for this.

  20. #9300
    Quote Originally Posted by Grokan View Post
    I'm interested in seeing evidence for this.
    I don't think there's anyway to show systemic evidence of it. It's an opinion. Read a bunch of their analyses and see if you agree or not. I'm entirely willing to accept that not everyone will agree. I think it's easy to find anecdotes of them being faux bipartisan, but that doesn't really prove much of anything.

    To be clear, I think they provide a fantastic and valuable service. I just don't think using their ratings as a standalone way to evaluate how often a candidate tells the truth works well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •