Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Lucky, you should start reading the replies in your thread. Your (mostly negative) interpretation of the Q&A isn't always accurate. Other have corrected them accordingly. If you want this tread to be constructive you should edit your OP. Unless you want the 'flame-bait' tag to stick.

    Larynx provided you with the correct interpretation of your third point. Show some good-will and add it in the OP.

  2. #22
    Bloodsail Admiral Ishu's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,036
    Quote Originally Posted by rhandric View Post
    Structured PvP, unless they changed it, is lobby based, so it doesn't make sense for your home server to matter. You can queue with friends, you can queue with random people, it's your choice.
    I know it is, but I'm not sure I'll like it. I don't like other lobby based games either. They feel to anonymous, and even if you can play with friends (and against friends) it requires too much organization for me. I liked it in WoW when I could just sign up, and it would automatically queue me up with and against people I'd know (or at least have seen before).

  3. #23
    The Insane DrakeWurrum's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Isle of Faces
    Posts
    15,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Larynx View Post
    however the first step of the plan is to make the PvP enjoyable
    This refutes your interpretation!
    I hope you haven't forgotten my role in this little story. I'm the leading man. You know what they say about the leading man? He never dies.

    If you give in to your impulses in this world, the price is that it changes your personality in the real world. The player and character are one and the same.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by nocturnus View Post
    Lucky, you should start reading the replies in your thread. Your (mostly negative) interpretation of the Q&A isn't always accurate. Other have corrected them accordingly. If you want this tread to be constructive you should edit your OP. Unless you want the 'flame-bait' tag to stick.

    Larynx provided you with the correct interpretation of your third point. Show some good-will and add it in the OP.
    I don't think I've ever seen him say anything not negative.

    ---------- Post added 2012-04-07 at 06:40 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by DrakeWurrum View Post
    This refutes your interpretation!
    I refute your interpretation of the meaning of enjoyable!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •