Government is the initiation of force. Think about it. Try not paying your taxes. At first you'll let a letter or a phone call saying "Hey, you aren't paying! Pay up!" Next you get a notice to go to court. And after that, police will show up to your house to apprehend you. If you defend yourself, you get gunned down. Government breaks the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) by initiating force upon it's sheep (citizens). Now you're probably thinking that this is just some teenage pot head trying to rebel against the man. Well I assure you, I believe drugs are immoral as well, however, I do believe you have the right to use them as long as you're not breaking the NAP.
Next you may say "Well! Without government, who will provide for the poor?" Government actually made the poor people poor, and if anyone did manage to become poor in a stateless society, charity would be provided. Who provides such charities you ask? towns would. Ostracism would be an effective tool. If you don't donate, you miss out on social relationships, don't get a sign on your lawn saying you donated etc. And even if this isn't perfect, is our current system any better?
"Well, what happens if we're invaded?" Private defense organizations/defense insurance companies would be there! Let us say that the U.S. becomes a stateless society and Canada has a choice to invade us or Russia. Let's say for all intents and purposes they really hate our guts for ripping them off with Maple Syrup tariffs before the collapse of the state. They must get through private defense companies, mercenaries and every single citizen fighting to not be taxed, and enslaved by another government. If Canada invaded Russia, all they would have to do is break down the Russian military, get to Moscow and claim victory. Once this happens, the Russian people don't take up arms against Canadian oppression, they merely switched mafia heads. One leader lost to another leader, it would be no different than a forced election where many people died.
"Oh, I've got you here! Medical care! How is this going to work?!" Well, the reason medical care is expensive now, is because of government intervention in the system, subsidies, medicare, medicaid, etc. If a doctor in a stateless society wants to charge $20 per patient, he is more than welcome to! If his next door neighbor wants to be a doctor and charge $15 per patient, he will simply get the majority of patients and drive the first doctor to either lower his rates or go out of business. "And what of surgery costs?" Same answer as before, surgeons will lower their rates as much as possible to where they still make a profit but get as many patients as possible. Health insurance will also be 100% privatized.
"Currency! What will be the currency of a stateless society!?" It doesn't matter. You could trade gold, silver, rocks, spoons or even pens. Whatever the seller wants that buyer will offer in exchange for the product the customer wants.
"Education is not receivable to most people without a government provided system!" Government has lowered education standards and does not actually teach you much. If you're older than 30 try telling me the integral of cotx. Try telling me the formula for resistance. If you were doing this math in high school, chances are, (unless you became a mathematician or a physicist) that you just regurgitated this information for the test and forgot it after. Real education advances would be made without the government.
"Well what about courts! For crimes such as murder, theft, or fraud!" DROs or Dispute Resolution organizations will be created. These groups will insure you on your rights, if they are ever to be violated, through the sue of ostracism. This system will reduce crime by lowering the benefit of committing crime, and by increasing the risk. If you don't belong to a DRO, you will be on a blacklist. Many people will not want to interact with you because of your decision, but it's your decision. I speculate that there may be DRO cards people would need to buy groceries, water, and other items, and without it, you're out of luck. This means that the wisest choice is probably to join, but not necessary, like today's state is. Private defense agencies will also be instated, allowing for you to defend yourself as you see fit. This is comparable to buying locks for your things. It's not a bad idea, but you will need to buy it if you want it. Otherwise, you'll be leaving things unlocked and open to be taken or damaged. Basically, this society relies on the prevention of crime, rather than the correction of it. If you violate someone's rights, you would be blacklisted and living would be extremely difficult, making a mugging, or any other theft very risky, and ultimately, offering little to no benefit. The best way to preserve our natural rights is to prevent the violation of them, not to correct the violator after he's done. Ultimately, you could maybe somehow find a way to live off a DRO in an underground commune or something, but your life is still basically ruined. There are a number of ways the blacklists could work, such as each DRO sharing their blacklists to keep people from violating someone's rights and moving on to another DRO. The main idea, is that you are given poor quality defense, and poor quality insurance of rights today by mandated taxation, and if we made everything optional and privatized, we would receive higher quality protection, higher quality rights insurance, and the ability to not have either, if you so choose. Ultimately, you are free.
So, those are the ways anarchism would benefit us, whereas the state not only does not benefit it, it hinders us, enslaves us and attacks us. I advocate an anarchist society, but I want to achieve it nonviolently. Using violence to achieve anarchy will not only fail, but it will just prop up warlords and dictators in an even worse society. Nonviolence, education, and will power are the only way to get rid of the state. I hope that one day we'll realize that we do not need a government to tell us what to do, what to think or what to feel.
So, If you can come up with another argument that you think the state can solve better than anarchy, please, share it, and I'll post my response. If I have opened anyone's mind or even sparked an interest to anarchism, please search Freedomain Radio on Youtube or Google, and look for Stefan Molyneux, as he does a MUCH better job at explaining the ideal, stateless society! Thanks if you read this all the way through!