I want to puke every time I see those numbers.
I want to puke every time I see those numbers.
It used to be none existant tbh, for example the men that served in Congo(and that was without a doubt the fiercest operations swedish soldiers had been involved in for 100s of years) got absolutely zero support, it hasn't been that bad for soldiers in Afghanistan though, a few cases that could have been handled smarter. They've changed things to the better though, previously "veteran support" was only available for 5 years, now it's lifelong for example.
Last edited by Jackmoves; 2012-06-27 at 11:56 AM.
The nerve is called the "nerve of awareness". You cant dissect it. Its a current that runs up the center of your spine. I dont know if any of you have sat down, crossed your legs, smoked DMT, and watch what happens... but what happens to me is this big thing goes RRRRRRRRRAAAAAWWW! up my spine and flashes in my brain... well apparently thats whats going to happen if I do this stuff...
When you call them veteran's benefits, it ceases to be politically expedient to cut them.
Military, Interest on Debt, Veterans Benefits, social security+unemplyoment = wasting money. Your country wastes 27+ 14.5+12.2+4.4= 59.1% of the budget is waste of money on useless stuff.
Last edited by mmoc74dbc71507; 2012-06-27 at 01:36 PM.
You know...seeing how VA hospitals are run is the ONLY thing that makes me feel uneasy about government run healthcare.
Get a grip man! It's CHEESE!
That's very sad to hear. Hope things work out fer ya mate.
---------- Post added 2012-06-28 at 03:48 AM ----------
I would like to point out that this is not just true for the US ( I am not an American). Sadly this is true for most countries around the world. Imagine of science had military's share even for a period of 5 years...we'd have cured most diseases and moon would be a holiday destination.
Are you trying to imply that if we did not have the motive of military superiority and/or inventing better ways of killing people we would not advance?
And still it does not surprise me. If science is only getting 1cent per dollar it can't really do as much as military with it's swollen coffers, can it?
That was true for the world wars but since then, science has pretty much held it's own. We don't need wars to progress, just political will and a bit more funding. And case and point - name 5 great inventions/discoveries that can be attributed to the Afghanistan war or the Vietnam war.
I didn’t say war. I said military projects.
"DARPA has been responsible for funding the development of many technologies which have had a major effect on the world, including computer networking, as well as NLS, which was both the first hypertext system, and an important precursor to the contemporary ubiquitous graphical user interface."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA
Sure but if you lump together all the money put into it about what 1%(?) was put into researching something that could be applied to civilian use.
It is true alot of inventions were military, radar, jet engine etc but well it is such a tiny fraction that I dont see it as an argument to justify the money spent on military science if one want to look at those spendings in such a manner.
Think it is fair to say that those inventions whould have come anyway, maybe later but anyway and at a far lower cost
But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.