Originally Posted by
Protoman
If you asked anyone what class/spec do you think "Windwalker" sounds like, they'd prob say shaman and not monk.....if they renamed the specs for Shaman then Windwalker would have been perfect for Enhance.....and infact "Mistweaver" would have been perfect for Resto with all the water themed spells they have.....I've never heard of mists connected with monks until "mists of panderia"......water for resto and wind for enhance are commonly related themes.
Plus there are several Shaman NPC's in WoW already with Windwalker surnames.....and even Native American Shamans have used the name "Windwalker"....so yea it was def a Shaman thing first.
I really don't care for 2H, just pointing out that Blizz went and accommodated DK's when they said Frost would be DW only and gave them 2H back....and then Monks as a DW agility class (when the problem with a 2H enhance was all the 2H's were str) and let them use 2H staffs as well (dunno if there are any other 2H agil weapons other then that). But despite players also wanting a 2H shaman they weren't willing to make that work.
There is also tanking, or tanking AND 2H....which Enhance wanted but both DK's and Monks have gotten....an Earth themed shaman that could DW or use 2H and tank would have been awesome and a longtime dream for many Shaman.
I already explained that I prefer DW for double imbues, this wasn't my attempt to bring 2H back so there is no need for your contradictions.....I'm giving the only known examples I know of things Enhance wanted or suggested that the other new classes have received. I don't see many other similarities between Monks and Enhance other then those facts.....DW and 2H, can tank, and the windwalker name.....maybe statues look like totems....infinite resource? Not sure but they seem like pretty different specs and playstyles....DK and enhance seemed more similar imo