Resurrected Lincoln 2012 on the Socialist Fascist Paleo-Libertarian Ecologist Revolutionary Front ticket.
Resurrected Lincoln 2012 on the Socialist Fascist Paleo-Libertarian Ecologist Revolutionary Front ticket.
"Assuming America does the right thing and elects Romney"
Ok want a brits opinion? If you elect Romney, the rest of the world except Israel will A) laugh B) begin to ignore you C) treat you as the petulent teenager of the world rather than just think it and treat you like an adult.
There's no difference between Romney or Obama.
Both will lie to you, both will tell you exactly what you want to hear, both will just attack each other instead of discussing what they stand for(er, what you want them to stand for.)
Politicians will f**k your country up no matter which President you choose, might as well pick the most charismatic which means Obama wins hands down.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Aulaqi
but you do not care about facts, and the fact that obama ordered his and his sons killing. You just want to lie and make it seem like it was all the republicans fault, somehow, that obama ordered his death.
No, he was right to stop reading this mess.
Your original posts at 3 paragraphs, 10 sentences. 5 of those sentences had Obama in it and 1 other directly referenced him and only him (p2 sentence 2).
And with that context you posted you expect a youth filled, largely democratic crowd to respond seriously while ignoring over half your original post was just blatant Obama bashing?
And even though you keep posting;
"This thread is not about the election, it is about how romney would be as a president."
You keep directly quoting and arguing with people about Obama. There's no one else in this thread who has technically been more off-topic than you.
If you wanted to have a serious hypothetical discussion about Romney, then you should stop responding to people "you" think are "trolls" and do better to stick to your original goal, which was again poorly conveyed in your original post.
You should learn not to use such inflammatory remarks supposedly unrelated to your point of discussion. If you don't think you said anything inflammatory, then you're full of bullshit.
That's why this thread should be locked. Not because people disagree with you, but because you suck at making threads. Either that or you're a troll.
Re elect Obama at all costs. An impotent president who does nothing is infinitely better than Bush 2.0.
We'll just have to hope for better options in 2016.
“Invade” brings connotations of large scale ground operations and occupations so I think the word, while maybe technically correct, is incendiary. Getting back to your question – I think a targeted special forces opt to take out a high priority target is perfectly acceptable.
Elect Romney? Oh goodness no...
Republican ideology is flawed to the core.