Hi,
I'm a bit confused with respect to Juggernaut v/s Double Time.
Code:
Double Time Usage [Time Optimal]
Time |
Charge# |
00:00 |
1 |
00:10 |
2 |
00:20 |
1 |
00:30 |
2 |
00:40 |
1 |
00:50 |
2 |
01:00 |
1 |
Juggernaut/ Double Time Usage [Rage Optimal]
Time |
Charge# |
00:00 |
1 |
00:12 |
2 |
00:24 |
1 |
00:36 |
2 |
00:48 |
1 |
01:00 |
2 |
As far as I can deduce, Double Time is ALWAYS better than or equal-to Juggernaut. Why you ask? Because the [Rage Optimal] table shows us that Double Time usage works EXACTLY like Juggernaut, whilst the [Time Optimal] table shows us that if Rage gains are allowed to be compromised then Double Time can still be used MORE often than Juggernaut. (at least 1 time more every 1minute).
Could someone please explain to me if there is something wrong with my calculation or portrayal of the events? If not, does anyone know why anyone would ever take Juggernaut? (other than perhaps to avoid the possibility of screwing up the Rage Optimization aspect, i.e. using Charge within the 12sec window.)
Cheers.