Last edited by SirRobin; 2012-11-12 at 10:54 PM.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Bashing me won't solve anything. But, it seems to make you feel better. You is a general term of previous disagreements towards me. My beliefs and views are not as welcomed here. And that"s fine. Just turbulence on an aircraft. No big deal.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
I'm just curious how it went from Jimmy Carter's fault to Clinton's.
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.
My good man, which is why I specified by saying "for the forseeable future". Unforeseen circumstances may well lead to the destruction of the west. Don't mistake naivete with passion by the way! I look at humanity on a scale that goes beyond the present and beyond the self, and I envision where humanity will be in a billion to 5 billion years. I see the west as a genuine stepping stone in the progression of our species that cannot be denied. A stepping stone that brought to the world the ideals of freedom and human rights. A very important step on our way to become the best we can possibly be, which is why I openly account for all our mistakes.
The cause of human progression is greater than I am as an individual, as countless billions if not trillions of humans that will eventually span the galaxy and maybe even the universe will live in a way that is dependant on the actions of their predecessors. I call upon others as I endeavour myself to be a part of the progression of mankind rather than the holding back of it, and put that task above the petty needs of the self. There is no way in this life time we will achieve a utopia, but some day we will far in the future. At this moment in time, the best chance humanity has for progression is through the ideals of the west above all else. That is what I believe and I have never came across any knowledge that would make me honestly and objectively think otherwise.
"The truth, my goal."
So we go from being hypocritical slash ignorant for not knowing things, like Greenspan being Clinton's treasurer, to bashing you because he actually wasn't? Whether your views are welcome or not. Actually being able to back them up with something like credible sources would probably help your claims hold up to at least a cursory examination.
---------- Post added 2012-11-12 at 05:38 PM ----------
Because neither of them were republicans?
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
This sounds oddly familiar.... oh wait, is this part of the WoW is dying threads?
This is some of the most hypocritical nonsense I have ever seen. You call people on facts claiming the economy started failing under Clinton thanks to Greenspan who was actually appointed by Reagan, telling them to get informed while you yourself are massively incorrect. You deflect that with "I'm sorry if you thought I was wrong, people still need to get informed" completely ignoring you are the one spouting rhetoric and false statements. Now your criticize this guys grammar? Firstly, you have no concept of sentence structure. Secondly, civilisation is a perfectly acceptable term depending on where you live just like honour, armour, etc.
MMO-C nightly hockey chat http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=#mmoc-hockey
If I had a nickel every time that someone thought the us was falling apart I would have $2.6875.
Time...line? Time isn't made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round. ~ Caboose
It fell apart the day FDR took office. He was socialist swine.
I have reached out and apologized to my criticism on the matter at hand. However, I believe intelligence should be based on the knowledge absorbed through learning. Not through a reference recall. In this "information age" knowledge is abundant but is it true individual knowledge?
Logic will remain logic, even in complex forms.
Anyone else wish to poke and prod me?
And no I'm not trolling. I welcome valid arguments.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Nope, to discuss and reason with all viewpoints is a good thing. But, to shut down or attempt too. A person for certain ideals is wrong.
I attempt to be the least hippocritical of all. But, people will have their own beliefs and attempt to spin topics into chaos.
It is childish and nothing new. I welcome new perspectives and also maturity.
I forget to mention that everything in a way regardless how it is viewed outside/inside this thread or in the USA is effected somehow.
Well back to the original post then I guess.
There are a number of problems with this petition's claims.
- The United states does not actually suffer economic difficulties stemming from etc, etc, etc... The U.S. suffers economic difficulties because its political leadership has been suckered time and time again into thinking something will help when it actually does more harm than good. Two examples being outsourcing slash offshoring and the repeal of Glass-Steagall.
- Citizens do not suffer blatant abuses. Is the one who wrote this seriously attempting to call the National Defense Authorization Act an abuse of citizen rights? Seriously? The Transportation Security Administration is a blatant abuse of citizen rights? Which right? The right to be killed by terrorists? When I read this part the first thing that popped into my mind was that someone must not want to have to worry about being indefinitely detained when the TSA catches them trying to bring handguns and grenades on to a plane.
- Texas fails to actually "maintain a balanced budget." Previously using federal stimulus money, and now gimmicks, to "balance" that budget.
- Texas leaving the Union would not secure its citizens' standard of living. If anything it would put them at even greater risk given the withdrawal of all the support provided by federal agencies and programs, like Medicaid, Social Security, etc, etc... Not to mention that federal laws, like antitrust, would naturally not apply to a now foreign nation.
- Since the United States Supreme Court is the official interpreter, so to speak, of our founding fathers' ideas and beliefs as passed down to us through the constitution. I don't see how separating themselves from the that body's oversight would in any way actually secure their rights or liberties. If anything it would put their rights and liberties in greater jeopardy.
Given those points I think its safe to conclude that instead of, "people had enough sh17." The one who wrote that petition is actually full of "sh17."
Last edited by SirRobin; 2012-11-13 at 01:28 AM. Reason: Wording
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.