When she's old enough to attend juvenile hall, then there until 18 if the father was prosecuted and it was caught earlier. If it was found that she lied prior to that, then it should be a family issue, but the family (not the victims side) should have to pay for the investigation time and resources.
Maybe I'm a little slow, I've read this several times and cant see where you've actually said if you are interested in 'justice' in this case or not, BUT, given your previous answer that nothing should happen to her, and you just saying that 'if she is charged for breaking the law, its justice'.. nm... I'm not going to draw a conclusion from what you've said, or from your not answering the question... I'll just scratch my head on this for now.
This case is odd. No kit? No DNA tests? Nothing besides the 'I said he did it' for the jury to mull over? This doesn't seem to add up. It's a very messy case and I don't think we have any better details ATM to fully judge what is going on.
Some comments in this thread are more fucked up than the article tbh.
Now you are being intentionally obstinate... but thats okay, you appear to know plenty about the law, and if you are willing to carefully craft your 2nd question as you did then you know damn well what laws are in play here and I'm not going to hold your hand thru a trip thru Black's and point out every little thing for you.
I'll answer you as nebulously and vague as you... If thru malice, coaching from a 3rd party, or any other reason she made false statements that lead to the charging and/or conviction of another that deprived them of their liberty, and/or property, and placed them in dangerous situations for extended periods of time, then they should have to answer for that.
You know if you can't even tell him what law you're accusing her of breaking...
If an 11 y/o murders someone are they not punished? 9 years in prison is 6 years short of a "life" sentence in the US... She literally took a decade off a mans life and changed the way he will live til he dies(if he ever enjoys life the same again). Sorry rope it anyway you choose she deserves some form of punishment.
And yet a perjury charge in this case would have been really fucking easy to prove, due to the court transcripts. Statute of limitations is meant to protect the rights of the defendant from degraded evidence. Kinda hard to be degraded when it's certified transcripts kept by the state.