Probably very usefull for hunting a stampede or when you have to defend yourself against a local riot.
Probably very usefull for hunting a stampede or when you have to defend yourself against a local riot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tku8YI68-JA
something interesting for either side of the discussion
[QUOTE=Mayhem;32861054][url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tku8YI68
Points out that any round can kill you. But a .22 round which hits say a leg or arm, may not take a 200 pound guy down. Where as a .357 mag will. And yes Mayhem, I checked the article out. My wife had a uncle who was killed by a .22. Was shot 6 times however. So even a .22 weapon needs to be respected. When I was in the Army, we used a .45 cal. Model 1911. They told us up close and personal, it had the capability not just to kill, but knock down a attacker.
Knock down power is a myth. Shot placement is all that matters.
So if you had a choice between shooting a .22 several times at a charging bear or one .44 mag. shot, you would select the .22 so you could increase your chances of hitting the right spot?
Something to think about is there are very good reasons cops and the military chooses a higher cal. round than using the much cheaper .22.
Its more complicated than that. By that same token I could ask why don't cops and military arm everyone with a Barrett .50 cal?
Weight
Round Count
Cost
Recoil
All those aside. Shot placement > stopping power.
I'd take one .22LR to each eyeball rather than one .44 mag to the thigh. If you can put your shots where you want them, then the bullet size becomes less relevant. This is why I carry 9mm as oppose to .45
Last edited by TITAN308; 2015-03-22 at 05:52 PM.
Actually, the .44 Mag is not as effective against humans because it is too powerful and most bullets produce a small wound channel because they fail to expand.
Home defense for me is a 12 ga with #4 backed up by a 1911 in .45.
- - - Updated - - -
I have always found the .45 to be superior to the 9mm for accuracy and controllable recoil, but both are far inferior to my .357 revolver for accuracy.
The Ohio State Highway Patrol use to equip their officers with .357's. But they now carry 9mm's for the high capacity of the magazines and still have the capability of doing enough damage. I guess my point is mainly, higher caliber rounds do have the potential to do more damage or otherwise, why not stick to the much cheaper .22 caliber hollow point rounds? Personally for myself, the weapon I use for home defense is a .357 revolver. I have a .22 revolver, but do not have the confidence in it stopping a intruder like I do the .357 mag with copper jacketed hollow points.
Then you would be the exception to the rule. By science the 9mm round is going to have less recoil than a .45 and thus make it more accurate. Now this is in terms of Average Joe.
If you are professional competitor or train with a .45 obviously you will learn to wield it just as well.
The saying goes, "Shoot what you are comfortable with". If that means a .22LR then thats what you should carry.
I carry 9mm (147gr) because it is more forgiving and I can carry double the amount as .45 in most cases in a single magazine. It is also far cheaper to train with because the prices are night and day.
I have a few 1911's in my collection, but I don't carry them 99% of the time.
Last edited by TITAN308; 2015-03-23 at 01:56 AM.