Conservative: Double down and don't give in to the liberal media.
Conservative: Kick out the pro-lifers, but draw the line there and make our stand.
Conservative: Kick out all of the factions, without exception.
Conservative: Other (please state in reply)
Liberal: If I were you, I'd double down and not give in to the liberal media.
Liberal: If I were you I'd kick out the pro-lifers and draw the line there.
Liberal: If I were you I'd kick out all of the factions without exception.
Liberal: If I were you, I'd do something else entirely (please state in reply).
I'm all for the destruction of the republican party, if it can't reform as the new libertarian party. If it does manage to die as it is, the only thing that will remain is the Democrat (Fascist) party. I gurantee when given the choice of pro liberty, anti war, anti tax anti spending, itll beat the pro-war, pro-spending, pro-tax, anti liberty administration we have today.
No. Iran is a country with interests in direct contrast with those of America. The American government's duty is not to maintain equality among nations, but to do everything in its power to benefit the American people. All else is secondary. To end what will likely be the next argument before it starts; hypocrisy, as a concept, is entirely irrelevant in global politics. No nation on Earth gives a single fuck about fairness towards others. They act only upon what their own best interests are. To survive, America must act in this way as well. Iran having nuclear weapons is not in America's best interests. Therefore, America's best course of action is to prevent such a thing, through whatever means are deemed reasonable. This goes not just for Iran, but for all nations who would act against America and threaten it's position in the world. Superiority has nothing to do with it. America does what's best for America, Iran does what's best for Iran. If these two actions conflict, then the outcome will be decided by the more powerful entity.
People listening to Rush Limbaugh need to realize that they're just sheep in the herd. That guy made what? 65 million in 2010? Of course he wants to say radical things. People love some good drama and some radical shit they can copy pasta into their arguments. He gets paid! Most likely his personal views are far from as radical as his on air personality. He's a character. And he gets paid well for it. He would be nuts to stop cashing in on that.
"1 in 4 Americans are skeptical on climate change...who gives a shit? That doesn't matter. You don't need other people's opinions on a fact. You may as well have a poll asking: Which number is bigger? 5 or 15? Do Owls exist? Are there hats?"
It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.