I'd rather ensure a New Earth Century than any one singular country...
I'd rather ensure a New Earth Century than any one singular country...
Crime from strangers "may" drop. Though it is impossible to correlated "%ofpopulation with gun" to "violent crime" truly scientifically since living in a area with high crime will make you feel like you need one more.
Suicide rates and accidental gun deaths, and things like that Jan20,2013 new mexico incident where the 15yr old shot up his family (2 parents, 3 siblings) would increase however. Remember, there is no restrictions to gun ownership that require guns to be secured.
The previous poster doubtlessly associates liberal with Democrat, as most people in our country do.
It's ironic because Republicans/Conservatives are technically more liberal (using the European definition of the word) than Democrats/American Liberals.
Us Americans just like to muck up political lexicon for shits and giggles. Also, screw the metric system.
The compulsory military service doesn't make a ton of sense. What's the point? We already have a ridiculously strong military. We don't need the man power that having a few million extra people would provide, nor do we have the money to pay for those personnel. The anti-tyrant/dictator line of reasoning is ridiculous. The US government isn't nearly stagnant enough for a tyrant to rise without some world-changing catastrophe.
Saying everyone has to own a gun is no different than saying no one can own a gun. It's just not going to work.
The conservative United Nations idea seems rather pointless as well. The United Nations is already pretty useless by itself, since it has no real power to do anything. A second one won't help. (and if the United Nations appears strongly liberal to you OP, its because that's how the majority of countries lean, a new one won't change that unless membership is limited to "conservative" countries.)
Education is and always has been the way to prosperity. It leads to marketable innovation, and is what makes a country rich in the long term.
I see you have put a lot of work in this, congrats (no really, nice work)
I somewhat disagree with you on a lot of points tough and I'll admit that I didn't read everything.
I noticed how in your view America is the center of the world, I can tell you for a fact that it is not, because 80% of the world does not live in America.
Also, giving every civilian a gun in order to make the big bad government scared is flawed, in order to make the federal US government scared you should arm every civilian with a bomb capable of destroying a district at least.
You also said that a strong military should be a big focus, how does that cope with your gun argument?
As a European the though of America "dominating" and pulling the rest of the world into line makes me cringe on about 805 levels
Also a point that made my but clench to the point that I can barely unclench it
---------- Post added 2013-02-07 at 11:13 PM ----------
Everybody knows corporations are good for the economy, so they would never harm society in the name of profit
---------- Post added 2013-02-07 at 11:15 PM ----------
Whats also funny is that democrats are seen as a leftish party, in Europe they would be seen as central-right
Anti-gun isn't a "left-right" divide issue. Pro choice isn't either. Higher taxes is contextual, as is welfare. I'd suggest they're centre-right (as in, proper liberals) compared to the grand scale, where communism is left and anarchism is right. It's not like their policy is to shut down the free markets and/or buy all the means of production, or even raise tax rates or give welfare like Scandinavians do.
In fact as far as I'm aware the UK is the only european nation that outright bans guns for civilians.This is why people ban guns. Gun supporters don't know what guns are.Shotguns I'll give you (provided you're allowed 12 and larger gauges... because I mean... come on...) but not .22s.
I do think your ideas are fairly okay, I like obligatory military conscription and NHS. However, I do not like that America should be the very center and the ones "leading the world". Can't say that the belief that a single country shall somehow lead the way for every other country in almost everything is very healthy. A developed one is one of cooperation. Also, no way we can develop a better world if we keep putting ideas in the "left" and "right"-categories and instead see what's practical.
Its the rich greedy asshole CEO's, VP's, politicians and whatnot that fucked it all up. All these damn crooked businessmen (bankers no doubt) and the people at the top of the corporate giants need to stop the cheap greedy BS. Priority 1 in the US is to keep the backbone strong. That means making sure the middle class don't get shafted into oblivion. Without them it will all goto hell.
Not a bad post at all, you really put a lot of work into that, overall I agree.
I especially like how you acknowledge the global shift/split between the two thought processes, traditional American capitalism versus UN dominated socialism.
Hopefully we make the right choice and go against the UN.
For the night is dark and full of terrors