Teen soap star 'raped boy to prove he was bisexual' court hears

[Bakis]

His identity can't be revealed? Yet they leave enough information to single him out. Google-> Actors born in Surrey 1996-> --SNIP--.

Parents are porn directors. How interesting.

There is a reason they're not naming names in the article

I guess that in your world being a porn director automatically spawn rapist children amarite?

[blackyfrost]

Claiming rape? Why would you say that, it's not uncommon for things like this to go on for a year or more.

i've never heard of 2 people about the same age having this happen,when one is an adult and the other a child that's different

to have someone about your age "force" you to blow them means you didn't do much to stop it.
i already explained why you'd say that. big mean dad finds out his boy is "a queer" the kid would probably say whatever, or the parents would force the issue when they saw dollar signs, whatever

look at the Michael Jackson thing, came out years later that the boy's dad had made all this up and that the boy lied the whole time because his broke dentist dad wanted some cash (that he got)

even if this kid isn't gay and sucked and fucked the soap star because he was famous, that's not rape. that's regret. that's wrong.

[Themius]

i've never heard of 2 people about the same age having this happen,when one is an adult and the other a child that's different

to have someone about your age "force" you to blow them means you didn't do much to stop it.
i already explained why you'd say that. big mean dad finds out his boy is "a queer" the kid would probably say whatever, or the parents would force the issue when they saw dollar signs, whatever

look at the Michael Jackson thing, came out years later that the boy's dad had made all this up and that the boy lied the whole time because his broke dentist dad wanted some cash (that he got)

even if this kid isn't gay and sucked and fucked the soap star because he was famous, that's not rape. that's regret. that's wrong.

It does and has happens.

[Wikiy]

Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit unfair that he's being accused of rape (which is usually defined as penetration) while in actuality he just give the other guy a blowjob? On top of all that, It's not that hard to push away someone's head in that position. This has all been blown out of proportion (pun intended). It was either consensual or it was attempted whatever-it-was (that shouldn't be named rape because that's not what it was).

[Theodon]

Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit unfair that he's being accused of rape (which is usually defined as penetration) while in actuality he just give the other guy a blowjob? On top of all that, It's not that hard to push away someone's head in that position. This has all been blown out of proportion (pun intended). It was either consensual or it was attempted whatever-it-was (that shouldn't be named rape because that's not what it was).

Unless the news article is way off and someone posted another source in the thread, there was far more to it. He wasn't 'giving' but 'receiving' and, if the news article holds much truth, it wasn't consensual.

The actor, then 15, insisted he had to “be with a boy” as he forced the fellow stage school pupil to perform oral sex on him at the Wimbledon Theatre in southwest London, a jury heard.

He then dragged the 14-year-old into a stairwell the following day and raped him in front of his girlfriend, Blackfriars Crown Court was told.

[Wikiy]

Unless the news article is way off and someone posted another source in the thread, there was far more to it. He wasn't 'giving' but 'receiving' and, if the news article holds much truth, it wasn't consensual.

Seems I read wrong. My mistake.

Edit: This part, though, sounds a bit fishy. It's literally impossible to anally penetrate someone without lube, so I find it rather odd that a 15 year old brought lube to school and then raped someone.

He then dragged the 14-year-old into a stairwell the following day and raped him in front of his girlfriend, Blackfriars Crown Court was told.

[kivipää]

Take a look at some of the research done on how porn negatively affects the brain... And everything else subsequently.

And of course, since his parents work in porn, he sits around all day every day watching porn, way more than your average joe. Do you even realize how stupid that sounds?

[Themius]

Seems I read wrong. My mistake.

Edit: This part, though, sounds a bit fishy. It's literally impossible to anally penetrate someone without lube, so I find it rather odd that a 15 year old brought lube to school and then raped someone.

Lots of spit could be a possibility? Though I made the last time "spit" was used as my only time because oh no... no no it is not so fun. I never really thought about it but anal rape without some form of lubrication is quite difficult, unless someone just stretches them without care for injury, that I could see possible.

[Deleted]

Seems I read wrong. My mistake.

Edit: This part, though, sounds a bit fishy. It's literally impossible to anally penetrate someone without lube, so I find it rather odd that a 15 year old brought lube to school and then raped someone.

No its not, its just very painful and can cause injury.

also, everyone who tries to post names, remember its illegal to do so in the UK and speculation like this can lead to prosecution. You may want to look up the recent Lord McAlpine case where people falsely associated him with a crime on forums and twitter and he launched court cases against them, compelling the websites to reveal identifying data such as IP adresses etc.
Dont assume the internet gives you a free pass to speculate.

[Pann]

also, everyone who tries to post names, remember its illegal to do so in the UK and speculation like this can lead to prosecution. You may want to look up the recent Lord McAlpine case where people falsely associated him with a crime on forums and twitter and he launched court cases against them, compelling the websites to reveal identifying data such as IP adresses etc.
Dont assume the internet gives you a free pass to speculate.

As the case is currently being heard in court there is, also, the issue that naming the accused would be seen as contempt of court.

[Deleted]

As the case is currently being heard in court there is, also, the issue that naming the accused would be seen as contempt of court.

True.

I am always uneasy about speculating about people before a conviction is made. It destroys people's lives, when they may well be innocent.

IF they are guilty, and found to be so, then fine go ahead and name people, but until then, I think people should refrain from crass speculation.

[Deleted]

I guess that in your world being a porn director automatically spawn rapist children amarite?

So you're claiming that I'm from an alternate dimension? And you assume that the current innocent consensual BJ in fact was a rape?
No of course you don't, you never said that. Just the same as I never said that porn directors/actors have rapist children. I never accused him of rape, I accused him of getting a blowjob. There is a difference. But the guy I was talking about is innocent so no need to bring him up.

[Komati]

I don't think most criminals should get their picture, nor name published for all the public to see, unless they're on a crime spree, or their crime was so horrendous no human in that country can possibly forgive what the criminal did.

And that guy should get a really hard punishment, he sounds like a sociopath.

[Themius]

No its not, its just very painful and can cause injury.

also, everyone who tries to post names, remember its illegal to do so in the UK and speculation like this can lead to prosecution. You may want to look up the recent Lord McAlpine case where people falsely associated him with a crime on forums and twitter and he launched court cases against them, compelling the websites to reveal identifying data such as IP adresses etc.
Dont assume the internet gives you a free pass to speculate.

Well the news has already outed his name last year. So at this point exactly how much at fault could the speculator be IF THEY GOT their sources from papers.

[Master Jakken]

Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

[Kalis]

Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Innocent until proven guilty is an interesting concept, but the court of public opinion works much faster and doesn't have to deal with all that boring shit, like evidence.

[Deleted]

Well, he managed to prove more than his sexuality... that's for damn sure.

[Deleted]

Well the news has already outed his name last year. So at this point exactly how much at fault could the speculator be IF THEY GOT their sources from papers.

Sued for large amounts of money in damage to reputation. If the person wanted to pursue it. If in the UK prosecuted for contempt of court. The web site can be held liable too, and subject to action.

Whether that actually would happen or not is up for debate, but its certainally possible and has happened before.

[Activi-T]

I think it's important to note that the actor was cleared of all charges: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21940950

[Stir]

Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit unfair that he's being accused of rape (which is usually defined as penetration) while in actuality he just give the other guy a blowjob? On top of all that, It's not that hard to push away someone's head in that position. This has all been blown out of proportion (pun intended). It was either consensual or it was attempted whatever-it-was (that shouldn't be named rape because that's not what it was).

No; penetration itself has no bearing on whether or not it was rape. Consent is everything.

I think it's important to note that the actor was cleared of all charges: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21940950

That's good for him! Let's hope that his professional life hasn't been ruined by it, though. Allegations such as this are hard to deal with, and even if he's proven innocent, most people will probably believe that he wasn't.