http://www.wisconsingazette.com/nati...-oklahoma.html
84-0. Its nice to see our country is still diverse. Too much of one side (for or against) isnt good for a nation.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/dis...e-sex-marriage
http://www.wisconsingazette.com/nati...-oklahoma.html
84-0. Its nice to see our country is still diverse. Too much of one side (for or against) isnt good for a nation.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/dis...e-sex-marriage
Last edited by Pendulous; 2013-04-23 at 11:31 PM.
You say that, while it's an apparently one-sided decision. By your definition, that's not good.
Change gay marriage for racial equality then see how ridiculous you sound.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
84-0 interesting. I wonder who even proposed it if it had no support.
Pff of course it was... The state is not called OklaHOMO
Ha. Too much of equality is a bad thing he says. Maybe one day your rights will be voted away. I'm sure you'll be all, "lulz. can't have too much of a good thing. It's probably better that I can't do this. Guess I'll just up and move to a state that allows it because it's easy to do."
"Minnisota"???? I've never even heard of that place.
Keep The Beats!
It is kinda shocking since there is a gay senate, apparently him and a lot others just walked out.
You show your true face.
Why is it garbage if one believes that being homosexual is a choice?
Notice that I'm not taking sides here, since I've heard varied stances on this issue from homosexuals themselves.
Do you believe homosexuals are born that way? If so, is there a ''gene'' or a different trait that causes people to be homosexuals?
Do you have any studies to show me that that is the case?
States can vote it down all they want, but when it becomes federal law, they're going to be fucked when the National Guard shows up to enforce the issuance of marriage licenses. May as well bite the bullet and get it approved now. We all know what happens when the National Guard shows up with itchy trigger fingers.