It's pronounced "Dur-av-ian."
Why has there been no talk about implementing a flat tax system? It would essesntially eliminate all these problems with the IRS and ensure that big businesses pay thier fair share of taxes, which is what everyone wants right?
As soon as any sort of shooting occurs, the media is up in arms about the need for an increase in gun control. Why has the media not brought up the idea of a flat tax to reduce the chances of something like this occuring in the future?
Logically, it would appear to be the next step in solving such issues.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning.
-Kujako-
No, no it wouldn't. See this is what happens when republicans drum up non-scandals. They waste tax payer money through these hearings, threaten civil servants on c-span, and then suggest their own crackpot "solutions" to a problem that didn't exist. 501 c 4's, if anything, should be scrutinized, especially after they spent over 200 million dollars in the 2012 election. They are not allowed to have any overt political position or campaign for anyone running for office.
Citizens United decision started this whole tax exemption questionnaire, flooding the Cincinnati IRS office with 70,000 applications for 501 c 4's. The wording in the tax law is vague as shit, and to try to have a semblance of enforcement and following the vague wording written by congressmen 100 years ago, they mailed a questionnaire to 300 groups with varying keywords. Some were conservative, some were liberal, some had absolutely nothing to do with politics, yet they were all GRANTED.
I'm always curious why libs are against a flat tax system. It would ensure that big, bad rich people would pay more than lower income people. What is your reasoning to be against it?
And it is relevant in this situation, because people should be more concerned with not allowing something like this to happen in the future. I know getting rid of the IRS would reduce Government power, which people on the left are against; but it would reduce the possibility of something like this occuring in the future.
You have no idea what you are talking about. The constitution enables the federal government to collect tax; so by abolishing the IRS you would need a different tax collections agency.
Nothing illegal nor unethical occurred. The IRS office was flooded with 501 c 4's after the landmark Citizens United decision, essentially making campaign funding/marketing essentially a legal money laundering loophole for campaigns.
of "coarse" it's been shown to crush anyone who isn't a millionaire, it's not that it's a conservative idea that makes it bad...it's just plain bad to begin with.
---------- Post added 2013-05-23 at 09:57 AM ----------
the partisanship is strong with this one.