http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3399310.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...rail:Position1
http://news.yahoo.com/monumental-pho...214828693.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...0box:Position1
The President is no different than Bush, if not worse. He tells us that in order to protect our liberty, he must take it away.. Violate it, destroy it, spit on it. How does taking our freedoms away, keep our freedoms safe? I suppose if you have none then you would have no freedoms to worry about.
I prefer liberty over safety. Kings would tell their people that they must not be free in order to be safe.