I am curious to see what people say.
I am curious to see what people say.
Socialism aslong as they can keep crime rates down, more so among immigrants. If they can't keep it down, fascism since there's national socialism there anyways, socialism without the immigrants.
Last edited by mmoc506e44f6eb; 2013-06-29 at 11:42 PM.
None of these systems are inherently evil. Provided they were all working "ideally", any of them would be good.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
Out of those options, socialism.
"Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism that came to prominence in early 20th century Europe. Fascists seek to unify their nation through a totalitarian state that promotes the mass mobilization of the national community, relying on a vanguard party to initiate a revolution to organize the nation on fascist principles. Hostile to liberal democracy, socialism, and communism, fascist movements share certain common features, including the veneration of the state, a devotion to a strong leader, and an emphasis on ultranationalism and militarism. Fascism views political violence, war, and imperialism as a means to achieve national rejuvenation and asserts that stronger nations have the right to obtain land and resources by displacing weaker nations."
Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
In a perfect world, with no corruption, I'd go with socialism.
My book I had say they preferer national syndicalism OR national socialism. ._.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism - wikipedia saying it's a variant of fascism apparently.. o.o
"National Socialism, is a variety of fascism that incorporates biological racism and antisemitism."
Last edited by mmoc506e44f6eb; 2013-06-29 at 11:51 PM.
Half of these aren't really types of governments, they are economic systems.
If it's a one or the other type scenario, then none of the above.
They're all economic systems (huge part of government as it effects us all and our national stockpile). Except for anarchy, which is just for those who hate the government for some reason.
---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 04:52 PM ----------
Capitalists deplete more resources (for financial gain). How would communists deplete more?
Not sure that is ever possible. Maybe absence of scarcity for food, shelter, clothing, etc. But for everything? Lol.
---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 11:56 PM ----------
+1 for accurate comment. China is a good example of a capitalist-fascist mix calling itself communist.
Class-less and equal is true communism. Why doesn't any communist party preach statelessness? Because it's a bad idea.
---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 05:04 PM ----------
/look at your post
/look at your avatar
/look at your post
/back at your avatar
Not this again!
Last edited by Thalian; 2013-06-30 at 12:05 AM.