There's a $100 difference between the 3470 and Fs600 two where I am, and they both seem to pump out around the same amount of speed according to pc mark:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Which one would you guys choose?
There's a $100 difference between the 3470 and Fs600 two where I am, and they both seem to pump out around the same amount of speed according to pc mark:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Which one would you guys choose?
Firstly, Passmark is usually a very poor benchmark for determining if a CPU would be good or bad for you. Especially for games.
Secondly, ....what's an "FS600"? Or am I being stupid and missing something obvious here.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
He probably means the FX-6300.
But yeah, the linked benchmark says very little about gaming performance, especially for WoW. (Where the i5 would be a good deal faster)
Why do something simple, when there is a complicated way?
Ryzen 7 2700X | BeQuiet Dark Rock Pro 4 | 16GB DDR4-3200 | MSI X470 Gaming Pro | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G | 500GB / 750GB Crucial SSD
Fractal Define C | LG 32UK550 | Das Model S Professional Silent | CM Storm Xornet
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
lol, I'm being stupid, not slept much. I noticed Chaud recommended Fx6300 on the cheaper setups, that's why I asked. What do you guys usually check for WoW ; Tom'shardware tests?
I didn't know it wasn't good for testing gaming performance, thanks for informing me.
i5 3470 is better in WoW because it has better IPC, ie, instructions per clock cycle. Meaning it would be faster, per thread, at the same clock speeds.
Assuming you are not comfortable overclocking. If you are, the tables shift into the FX-6300 favour.
EDIT: Oh, also. I editted the title.
Last edited by BicycleMafioso; 2013-07-03 at 04:56 AM.
I still have a hard time recommending an FX-6300. On a budget, it's good, however an i3-3220 would let you upgrade later to a 3570K (with proper board). The only time I could really suggest an FX-6300 is if you truly believe that you won't upgrade in the next couple years, and can't scrouge up the extra $150 now or soon for a 3570K
Basically..
FX-6300 < i3-3220 < i5-3470 < FX-6300 OC < i5-3570K < i5-3570K OC
Between weakest and strongest, we're only looking at a total build difference of about $150.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab
Trust us here when we say ipc counts, I have been testing an A8-6600k and thus far it has performed fairly reasonable within most games with a 7870xt as the gpu, however in wow it is tanking hard @1080p simply due to poor ipc of the architecture. I can't forsee getting 25m content "playable" (min 30fps) without dipping the settings something shocking. Trust me when I say that intel in mmo's destroys amd.
Personal rig:
- i5-3570k (4.2ghz) || CM hyper 212 evo || Asrock extreme 4 || Corsair (2 x 4gb 1600mhz) ram
- Samsung 840 (120gb) || WD blue 1tb || WD green 1tb
- Powercolor 7870xt || Silverstone strider 500w ||NZXT source 210
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/62?i=701.702.289.699
Unless the FX-6300 can be overclocked to push a 52% performance increase, a FX-6300 OC is not better than an i5-3470 for WoW.
There's a good chance the FX-6300 OC can't even beat the i3-3220 in WoW.
I think Anandtech does a great reviews and benchmarks, however those particular benchmarks with WoW are not only outdated, but not close to what I've seen on just about every other websites benchmarks. The gap is not -that- large from what I've seen, and the only case of a large gap normally is when you overclock.
Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads"Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab