The positive is that there is still hope for the fishing industry. If heavy regulation didn't come into play it would have meant there were not a chance a 200 year old fish would have been caught.
Despite what the OP may think it's a VERY positive sign in this day and age.
Ancient rockfish caught in Alaska: Why nobody threw it back
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/...,3780325.story
For those wondering why the fisherman Henry Liebman did not throw the ancient fish back into the sea immediately after catching it, the answer is that the fish was almost certainly dead by the time he reeled it in.
"When a rockfish caught in 900 feet of water is brought to the surface it usually dies," said Julie Speegle, a spokeswoman for NOAA's Alaska region, in an interview with the L.A. Times.
Rockfish have a gas filled organ called a swim bladder that helps them control their buoancy. When they are brought up to the surface, the gas in the bladder expands and can cause it to burst which can kill the fish.
The fish was probably all like "could you be the one to finally finish me"
Jesus christ so what if he caught it, it's not like we would know there was a 200-year-old fish if he didn't catch it.
I couldn't stop laughing when I saw your avatar to that.
This thread was an interresting read but to be honest, it is a fish - and if it was not caught we wouldn't have known it existed. How many fish of that age have died naturally? We don't have a clue and we shouldn't make such a fuss over it. Science is science and science can be a tabu subject for a lot of people.
It's not like he had any idea of what he was pulling up and it would have been dead by the time he realized what it was. This fish lived a long lifetime reproducing. Better an old one than a new one that still has a lot of reproducing to do.
This also. If you look at pictures of fishing going back over the last 100 years, you will notice a significant decrease in the size and age of fish, because human consumption of them has increased so drastically. The fact that there are still ancient fish like this swimming around means that despite our overfishing, some species are still trucking along. Not that our overfishing isn't bad of course, but it's still a good sign for ocean life.
It's suggested that some kinds of sea fish are essentially immortal. That provided they are capable of getting food, they are not eaten by predators and so on, that they will essentially just keep living and growing.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
This kind of thing upsets you but you're not upset over the NSA destroying your privacy I would assume. You claim these people are sick or have their priorities wrong but it seems to me yours are wrong. It's all perception, though when you come to the lib kiddie infested internet you will hear what you want to hear.
To heck with the NSA, this catch is a tragedy of global scale.
Poor fish.
Rincewind: Ah! We may, in fact, have reached the root of the problem. However it's a silly problem and so I am suddenly going to stop talking to you.
The better character questionnaire (D&D)